The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity Explained and Vindicated

The doctrine of the blessed Trinity may be considered two ways. First, in respect to the revelation and proposal of it in the Scripture, to direct us to the author, object, and end of our faith, in our worship and obedience. Secondly, as it is further declared and explained, in terms, expressions, and propositions, educed from the original revelation of it, suited thereunto, and meet to direct and keep the mind from undue apprehensions of the things it believes; and to declare them to further edification.

In the first way, it consists merely in the propositions wherein the revelation of God is expressed in the Scripture; and in this regard two things are required of us. First, to understand the terms of the propositions, as they are enunciations of truth; and secondly, to believe the things taught, revealed, and declared in them.

In the first instance, no more, I say, is required of us, but that we assent to the assertions and testimonies of God concerning himself, according to their natural and genuine sense, as he will be known, believed in, feared and worshipped by us; as he is our Creator, Lord, and Rewarder; and that because he himself has by his revelation, not only warranted us so to do, but also made it our duty necessary and indispensable. Now the sum of this revelation in this matter is, that God is one; that this one God, is Father, Son and Holy Ghost; that the Father is the Father of the Son; and the Son, the Son of the Father; and the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of the Father and the Son; and that in respect of this their mutual relation, they are distinct from each other.

This is the substance of the doctrine of the Trinity as to the first direct concernment of faith therein. The first intention of the Scripture in the revelation of God towards us is, as was said, that we might fear him, believe, worship, obey him, and live to him, as God. That we may do this in a due manner, and worship the only true God, and not adore the false imaginations of our own minds, it declares, as was said, that this God is one, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost; that the Father is this one God, and therefore is to be believed in, worshipped, obeyed, lived to, and in all things considered by us as the first cause, sovereign Lord, and last end of all: that the Son, is the one true God, and therefore is to be believed in, worshipped, obeyed, lived to, and in all things considered by us as the first cause, sovereign Lord, and last end of all. And so also of the Holy Ghost. This is the whole of faith's concernment in this matter, as it respects the direct revelation of God made by himself in the Scripture, and the first proper general end thereof. Let this be clearly confirmed by direct and positive divine testimonies containing the declaration and revelation of God concerning himself, and faith is secured as to all its concerns. For it has both its proper formal object, and is sufficiently enabled to be directive of divine worship and obedience.

The explication of this doctrine to edification suitable to the revelation mentioned, is of another consideration. And two things are incumbent on us to take care of therein. First that what is affirmed and taught, do directly tend to the ends of the revelation itself, by informing and enlightening of the mind in the knowledge of the mystery of it, so far as in this life we are by divine assistance capable to comprehend it; that is, that faith may be increased, strengthened and confirmed against temptations and oppositions of Satan, and men of corrupt minds; and that we may be distinctly directed to, and encouraged in the obedience to, and worship of God that are required of us. Secondly, that nothing be affirmed or taught herein, that may beget, or occasion any undue apprehensions concerning God, or our obedience to him, with respect to the best, highest, securest revelations, that we have of him and our duty. These things being done and secured, the end of the declaration of this doctrine concerning God is attained.

In the declaration then of this doctrine to the edification of the Church, there is contained a further explanation of the things before asserted, as proposed directly, and in themselves as the object of our faith, namely, how God is one, in respect of his nature, substance, essence, Godhead, or divine being. How being Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, he subsists in these three distinct persons, or Hypostasies: and what are their mutual respects to each other, by which as their peculiar properties giving them the manner of their subsistence, they are distinguished one from another; with sundry other things of the like necessary consequence to the revelation mentioned. And herein as in the application of all other divine truths and mysteries whatever, yes, of all moral commanded duties, use is to be made of such words and expressions as it may be are not literally and formally contained in the Scripture; but only are to our conceptions and apprehensions expository of what is so contained. And to deny the liberty, yes, the necessity hereof, is to deny all interpretation of the Scripture, all endeavours to express the sense of the words of it, to the understandings of one another; which is in a word to render the Scripture itself altogether useless. For if it be unlawful for me to speak or write what I conceive to be the sense of the words of the Scripture, and the nature of the thing signified and expressed by them, it is unlawful for me also to think or conceive in my mind what is the sense of the words or nature of the things; which to say, is to make brutes of ourselves, and to frustrate the whole design of God in giving to us the great privilege of his word.

Therefore in the declaration of the doctrine of the Trinity, we may lawfully, no, we must necessarily, make use of other words, phrases and expressions than what are literally and syllabically contained in the Scriptures, but teach no other things.

Moreover whatever is so revealed in the Scripture, is no less true and divine as to whatever necessarily followeth thereon, than it is, as to that which is principally revealed and directly expressed. For how far soever the lines be drawn and extended, from truth nothing can follow and ensue but what is true also; and that in the same kind of truth, with that which it is derived and deduced from. For if the principal assertion be a truth of divine revelation, so is also whatever is included therein, and which may be rightly from there collected. Hence it follows, that when the Scripture revealeth the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, to be one God, seeing it necessarily and unavoidably follows thereon that they are one in essence, wherein alone it is possible they can be one; and three in their distinct subsistences, wherein alone it is possible they can be three: this is no less of divine revelation, than the first principle from where these things follow.

These being the respects which the doctrine of the Trinity falls under, the necessary method of [illegible] and reason in the believing and declaring of it, is plain and evident.

1. The revelation [illegible] it is to be asserted and vindicated, as it [illegible] proposed to be believed for the ends mentioned. Now this is, as was declared, that there is one God, that this God, is Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and so, that the Father is God, so is the Son, so is the Holy Ghost.

This being received and admitted by faith, the explication of it is, (2.) to be insisted on, and not taken into consideration until the other be admitted. And herein lies the preposterous course of those who fallaciously and captiously go about to oppose this sacred truth. They will always begin their opposition, not to the revelation of it, but to the explanation of it which is used only for farther edification. Their disputes and cavils shall be against the Trinity, essence, substance, persons, personality, respects, properties of the divine persons, with the modes of expressing these things, while the plain scriptural revelation of the things themselves from where they are but explanatory deductions, is not spoken to, nor admitted to confirmation. By this means have they entangled many weak unstable souls, who when they have met with things too high, hard and difficult for them, (which in divine mysteries they may quickly do) in the explication of this doctrine, have suffered themselves to be taken off from a due consideration of the full and plain revelation of the thing itself in Scripture; until their temptations being made strong, and their darkness increased, it was too late for them to return to it; as bringing along with them the cavils wherewith they were prepossessed rather than that faith and obedience which is required. But yet all this while these explanations so excepted against, are indeed not of any original consideration in this matter. Let the direct express revelations of the doctrine be firmed, they will follow of themselves, nor will be excepted against by those who believe and receive it. Let that be rejected, and they will fall of themselves, and never be contended for by those who did make use of them. But of these things we shall treat again afterwards.

This therefore is the way, the only way that we rationally can, and that which in duty we ought to proceed in, and by, for the asserting and confirming of the doctrine of the holy Trinity under consideration; namely, that we produce divine revelations, or testimonies, wherein faith may safely rest and acquiesce, that God is one; that this one God, is Father, Son, and Holy Ghost; so that the Father is God; so also is the Son, and the Holy Ghost likewise, and as such are to be believed in, obeyed, worshipped, acknowledged as the first cause, and last end of all, our Lord and Reward. If this be not admitted, if somewhat of it be not particularly denied, we need not, we have no warrant or ground, to proceed any farther, or at all to discourse about the unity of the divine essence, or the distinction of persons.

We have not therefore any original contest in this matter with any, but such as deny either God to be one, or the Father to be God, or the Son to be God, or the Holy Ghost so to be. If any deny either of these in particular, we are ready to confirm it by sufficient testimonies of Scripture, or clear and undeniable divine revelation. When this is evinced and vindicated, we shall willingly proceed to manifest that the explications used of this doctrine to the edification of the Church are according to truth; and such as necessarily are required by the nature of the things themselves. And this gives us the method of the small ensuing discourse, with the reasons of it.

The first thing which we affirm to be delivered to us by divine revelation as the object of our faith is, that God is one. I know that this may be uncontrollably evidenced by the light of reason itself, to as good and quiet an assurance as the mind of man is capable of in any of its apprehensions whatever. But I speak of it now, as it is confirmed to us by divine revelation. How this assertion, of one God, respects the nature, essence, or divine being of God, shall be declared afterwards. At present it is enough to represent the testimonies that he is one, only one. And because we have no difference with our adversaries distinctly about this matter, I shall only name some few of them, (Deuteronomy 6:4) Hear O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord. A most pregnant testimony; and yet notwithstanding, as I shall elsewhere manifest, the Trinity itself, in that one divine essence is here asserted. (Isaiah 44:6, 8) Thus says the Lord, the King of Israel, and his Redeemer, the Lord of Hosts, I am the first, and I am the last, and besides me there is no God; Is there a God besides me? Yea there is no God, I know not any; in which also we may manifest that a plurality of persons is included and expressed. And although there be no more absolute and sacred truth than this, that God is one; yet it may be evinced, that it is no where mentioned in the Scripture, but that either in the words themselves, or the context of the place, a plurality of persons in that one sense is intimated.

Secondly, it is proposed as the object of our faith, that the Father is God. And herein as is pretended there is also an agreement, between us, and those who oppose the doctrine of the Trinity. But there is a mistake in this matter. Their hypothesis as they call it, or indeed presumptuous error, casts all the conceptions that are given us concerning God in the Scripture, into disorder and confusion. For the Father, as he whom we worship, is often called so, only with reference to his Son; as the Son is so, with reference to the Father. He is the only begotten of the Father (John 1:14). But now, if this Son had no preexistence in his Divine nature before he was born of the Virgin, there was no God the Father seventeen hundred years ago, because there was no Son. And on this ground did the Marcionites of old, plainly deny the Father whom under the New Testament we worship, to be the God of the Old Testament, who made the world and was worshipped from the foundation of it. For it seems to follow, that he whom we worship being the Father, and on this supposition that the Son had no preexistence to his incarnation, he was not the Father under the Old Testament, he is some other from him that was so revealed: I know the folly of that inference; yet how on this opinion of the sole existence of the Son in time, men can prove the Father to be God, let others determine. He who abides in the doctrine of Christ, he has both the Father and the Son, but whoever transgresses and abides not in the doctrine of Christ, he has not God (2 John 9). Whoever denies Christ the Son, as the Son, that is the eternal Son of God, he loses the Father also, and the true God; he has not God. For that God which is not the Father, and which ever was, and was not the Father, is not the true God. Hence many of the Fathers, even of the first writers of the Church, were forced to great pains in the confirmation of this truth, that the Father of Jesus Christ was he who made the world, gave the Law, spoke by the Prophets, and was the author of the Old Testament; and that against men who professed themselves to be Christians. And this brutish apprehension of theirs, arose from no other principle but this, that the Son had only a temporal existence, and was not the Eternal Son of God.

But that I may not in this brief discourse digress to other controversies than what lies directly before us, and seeing the adversaries of the truth we contend for, do, in words at least, grant that the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ is the true God, or the only true God, I shall not further show the inconsistency of their hypothesis with this confession; but take it for granted, that to us there is one God the Father (1 Corinthians 8:6; see John 17:3). So that he who is not the Father, who was not so from eternity, whose paternity is not equally coexistent to his Deity, is no God to us.

Thirdly, it is asserted and believed by the Church that Jesus Christ is God; the Eternal Son of God; that is, he is proposed, declared and revealed to us in the Scripture, to be God, that is to be served, worshipped, believed in, obeyed as God, upon the account of his own Divine excellencies. And whereas we believe and know that he was Man, that he was born, lived, and died as a Man, it is declared that he is God also; and that as God, he did preexist in the form of God before his Incarnation, which was effected by voluntary actings of his own; which could not be without a preexistence in another nature. This is proposed to us to be believed upon Divine testimony, and by Divine revelation. And the sole enquiry in this matter is, whether this be proposed in the Scripture as an object of faith, and that which is indispensably necessary for us to believe. Let us then nakedly attend to what the Scripture asserts in this matter, and that in the order of the books of it in some particular instances which at present occur to mind; as these that follow.

Psalm 45:6, "Your throne O God is for ever and ever," applied to Christ (Hebrews 1:8): "But to your Son he says, your throne O God is for ever and ever."

Psalm 68:17, 18, 19, "The chariots of God are twenty thousand, even thousands of angels, the Lord is among them as in Sinai in the holy place; you have ascended on high, you have led captivity captive, you have received gifts for men, yea, for the rebellious also, that the Lord God may dwell among them," applied to the Son (Ephesians 4:8): "Therefore he says, when he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts to men. Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the Earth; he that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things."

Psalm 110:1, "The Lord said to my Lord, sit you at my right hand," applied to Christ by himself (Matthew 22:44).

Psalm 102:15, 16, 17, "Of old you have laid the foundation of the Earth and the Heavens are the work of your hands; they shall perish but you shall endure, yea, all of them shall wax old like a garment, as a vesture shall you change them, and they shall be changed, but you are the same, and your years shall have no end," declared by the Apostle to be meant of the Son (Hebrews 1:10).

Proverbs 8:22 to the 31: "The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his ways; before his works of old: I was set up from everlasting, in the beginning or ever the Earth was, when there were no depths, I was brought forth when there were no fountains abounding with waters, before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth; while as yet he had not made the Earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world; when he prepared the Heavens I was there; when he set a compass upon the face of the Earth, when he established the clouds above; and the fountains of the deep; when he gave to the Sea his decree that the waters should not pass his commandment; when he appointed the foundations of the Earth; then I was by him as one brought up with him, and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him; rejoicing in the habitable parts of his Earth, and my delights were with the sons of men."

Isa. 6:1, 2, 3. I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up and his train filled the temple; above it stood the Seraphims, each one had six wings, with twain he covered his face, with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did flye: and one cryed to another and said, Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord of Hosts, the whole earth is full of his glory — applyed to the Son (John 12:41, 42).

Isa. 8:13, 14. Sanctifie the Lord of Hosts himself, and let him be your dread; let him be your fear, and he shall be for a sanctuary, but for a stone of stumbling, and for a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel, for a gin and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem — applyed to the Son (Luke 2:34; Romans 9:33; 1 Peter 2:8).

Isa. 9:6. For to us a child is born, to us a Son is given, and the government shall be upon his shoulders; and his name shall be called wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty God, the Everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace; of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end.

Jer. 23:5, 6. Behold the day is come says the Lord that I will raise to David a righteous branch, and this is his name whereby he shall be called, Jehovah our Righteousness.

Hos. 12:3, 4, 5. He took his brother by the heel in the womb, and by his strength he had power with God; yea, he had power over the Angel and prevailed, he wept and made supplications to him; he found him in Bethel, and there he spake with us, even the Lord God of Hosts, the Lord is his memorial.

Zach. 2:8, 9. For thus says the Lord of Hosts, after the glory has he sent me to the nations which spoiled you, and you shall know that the Lord of Hosts has sent me.

Matt. 16:16. You are Christ the Son of the living God. Luke 1:35. The Holy Ghost shall come upon you, the power of the most High shall overshaddew you, therefore also shall that holy thing which shall be born of you, be called the Son of God.

John 1:1, 2, 3. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God; all things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

Ver. 14. And we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father.

John 3:3. And no man has ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.

John 8:56, 57, 58. Then said the Jews to him, you are not fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham? Jesus says to them, verily, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.

John 10:30. I and my Father are one.

John 17:3. And now O Father glorifie you me with your own self, with the glory which I had with you before the world was.

John 20:28. And Thomas answered and said to him, my Lord and my God.

Acts 20:28. Feed the Church of God which he has purchased with his own blood.

Romans 1:3, 4. Concerning his Son Jesus our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh, and declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead.

Romans 9:5. Of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came; who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.

Romans 14:10, 11, 12. For we shall all stand before the judgement seat of Christ; as it is written, as I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God. So then every one of us, shall give an account of himself to God.

1 Corinthians 8:6. And one Lord Jesus, by whom are all things, and we by him.

1 Corinthians 10:9. Neither let us also tempt Christ as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents; compared with (Numbers 21:6).

Phil. 2:5, 6. Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus; who being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God.

Col. 1:15, 16, 17. Who is the image of the invisible God, the first born of every creature; for by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers, all things were created by him and for him, and he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

1 Tim. 3:16. Without controversie great is the mysterie of godliness, God was manifested in the flesh.

Tit. 2:13. Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearance of the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us.

Hebrews the first throughout.

Chap. 3:4. For every house is builded by some man, but he that built all things is God.

1 Pet. 1:11. Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signifie.

Chap. 3:18, 19. But Christ also has once suffered for sinners, being put to death in the flesh, but quickned by the Spirit; by which also he went and preached to the spirits in prison which sometimes were disobedient, when once the long suffering of God waited in the dayes of Noah.

1 John 3:16. Hereby we perceive the love of God, because he laid down his life for us.

Chap. 5:20. And we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ, this is the true God and eternal life.

Rev. 1:8. I am Alpha, and Omega, the beginning and the ending, says the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

Ver. 11. I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, and what you see, write in a book: and I turned to see the voice that spake with me; and being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks, and in the midst of the seven candlesticks, one like to the Son of Man.

Ver. 17. And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead; and he laid his right hand upon me, saying to me, fear not, I am the First and the Last.

Chap. 2:23. I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts, and will give to every one of you according to your works.

These are some of the places wherein the truth under consideration is revealed and declared; some of the Divine Testimonies whereby it is confirmed, and established; which I have not at present enquired after, but suddenly repeated as they came to mind. Many more of the like nature and importance may be added to them; and shall be so as occasion does require.

Let now any one who owns the Scripture to be the Word of God, to contain an infallible revelation of the things proposed in it to be believed, and who has any conscience exercised towards God for the receiving and submitting to what he declares and reveals, take a view of these Testimonies, and consider whether they do not sufficiently propose this object of our faith. Shall a few poor trifling sophisms, whose terms are scarcely understood, by the most that among us make use of them, according as they have found them framed by others, be thought meet to be set up in opposition to these multiplied Testimonies of the Holy Ghost, and to cast the truth confirmed by them down from its credit and reputation in the consciences of men. For my part, I do not see in any thing, but that the Testimonies given to the Godhead of Christ, the Eternal Son of God, are every way as clear and unquestionable, as those are, which testify to the Being of God, or that there is any God at all. Were men acquainted with the Scriptures as they ought to be, and as the most, considering the means and advantages they have had, might have been, did they ponder and believe on what they [illegible], or had any tenderness in their consciences as to that reverence, obedience, and subjection of soul, which God requires to his Word, it were utterly impossible that their faith in this matter should ever in the least be shaken, by a few lewd sophisms, or loud clamours of men destitute of the truth, and of the Spirit of it.

That we may now improve these Testimonies to the end under design, as the nature of this brief discourse will bear, I shall first remove the general answers which the Socinians give to them; and then manifest farther, how incontrollable they are, by giving an instance in the frivolous exceptions of the same persons to one of them in particular. And we are ready, God assisting, to maintain, that there is not any one of them, which does not give a sufficient ground for faith to rest on in this matter concerning the Deity of Christ; and that against all the Socinians in the world.

They say therefore commonly, that we prove not by these testimonies what is by them denied. For they acknowledge Christ to be God, and that because he is exalted to that glory and authority that all creatures are put into subjection to him; and all both men and Angels are commanded to worship and adore him. So that he is God by office, though he be not God by nature. He is God, but he is not the most high God. And this last expression they have almost continually in their mouths. He is not the most high God. And commonly with great contempt and scorn they are ready to reproach them who have solidly confirmed the doctrine of the Deity of Christ, as ignorant of the state of controversy, in that they have not proved him to be the most high God, in subordination to whom, they acknowledge Christ to be God, and that he ought to be worshipped with divine and religious worship.

But there cannot be any thing more empty and vain than these pretences. And besides they accumulate in them, their former errors, with the addition of new ones. For,

First, the name of the most high God, is first ascribed to God in (Genesis 49:18, 19, 22) denoting his sovereignty and dominion. Now, as other attributes of God, it is not distinctive of the subject, but only descriptive of it. So are all other excellencies of the nature of God. It does not intimate that there are other Gods, only he is the most high, or one over them all, but only that the true God, is most high, that is endued with sovereign power, dominion and authority over all. To say then, that Christ indeed is God, but not the most high God, is all one as to say he is God, but not the most holy God, or not the true God. And so they have brought their Christ into the number of false Gods, while they deny the true Christ who in his divine nature, is over all God blessed for ever (Romans 9:5), a phrase of speech, perfectly expressing this attribute, of the most high God.

Secondly, this answer is suited only to those testimonies which express the name of God with a corresponding power and authority to that name. For in reference to these alone can it be pleaded with any pretence of reason, that he is a God by office; though that also be done very futilously and impertinently. But most of the Testimonies produced, speak directly to his divine excellencies, and properties, which belong to his nature necessarily and absolutely. That he is Eternal, Omnipotent, Immense, Omniscient, infinitely wise, and that he is, and works and produces effects suitable to all these properties, and such as nothing but they can enable him for, is abundantly proved by the foregoing Testimonies. Now all these concern a divine nature, a natural essence, a Godhead, and not such power or authority as a man may be exalted to. Yes, the ascribing any of them to such a one, implies the highest contradiction expressible.

Thirdly, this God in authority and office, and not by nature, that should be the object of divine worship, is a new abomination. For they are divine, essential excellencies that are the formal reason and object of religious and divine worship. And to ascribe it to any one, that is not God by nature, is idolatry. By making therefore their Christ such a God as they describe, they bring him under the severe commination of the true God (Jeremiah 10:11): 'The Gods that have not made the Heavens and the Earth, even they shall perish from the Earth, and from under these Heavens.' That Christ they worship, they say is a God; but they deny that he is that God that made the Heavens and the Earth: and so leave him exposed to the threatenings of him, who will accomplish it to the uttermost.

Some other general exceptions sometimes they make use of, which the Reader may free himself from the entanglement of, if he do but heed these ensuing rules.

Distinction of persons, (of which afterwards) it being in an infinite substance, does no way prove a difference of essence between the Father and the Son. Where therefore Christ as the Son, is said to be another from the Father, or God, spoken personally of the Father, it argues not in the least that he is not partaker of the same nature with him. That in one essence, there can be but one person, may be true where the substance is finite and limited, but has no place in that which is infinite.

Distinction and inequality in respect of office in Christ, does not in the least take away his equality and sameness with the Father, in respect of nature and essence (Philippians 2:7, 8). A Son, of the same nature with his Father, and therein equal to him, may in office be his inferior, his subject.

Thirdly, the advancement and exaltation of Christ as Mediator to any dignity whatever, upon, or in reference to the work of our redemption and salvation, is not at all inconsistent with the essential honor, dignity, and worth which he has in himself as God blessed for ever. Though he humbled himself and was exalted in office, yet in nature he was one and the same, he changed not.

Fourthly, the Scriptures asserting the humanity of Christ with the concerments thereof, as his birth, life, and death, do no more thereby deny his deity, than by asserting his deity with the essential properties thereof, they deny his humanity.

Fifthly, God working in and by Christ as he was Mediator, denotes the Father's sovereign appointment of the things mentioned to be done, not his immediate efficiency in the doing of the things themselves.

These rules are proposed a little before their due place in the method which we pursue. But I thought meet to interpose them here, as containing a sufficient ground for the resolution and answering of all the sophisms and objections which the adversaries use in this cause.

From the cloud of witnesses before produced, every one whereof is singly sufficient to evert the Socinian infidelity; I shall in one of them give an instance both of the clearness of the evidence, and the weakness of the exceptions which are wont to put in against them as was promised. And this is, John 1:1, 2, 3. In the Beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, the same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.

By the Word, here, or [in non-Latin alphabet], on what account soever he be so called, either as being the Eternal Word and wisdom of the Father, or as the great Revealer of the will of God to us, Jesus Christ the Son of God is intended. This is on all hands acknowledged, and the context will admit of no hesitation about it. For of this Word, it is said, that he came into the World (v. 10), was rejected by his own (v. 11), was made flesh and dwelt among us whose glory was the glory of the only begotten Son of the Father (v. 14), called expressly Jesus Christ (v. 17), the only begotten Son of the Father (v. 18). The subject then treated of is here agreed upon. And it is no less evident that it is the design of the Apostle to declare both who, and what he was of whom he treateth. Here then, if any where, we may learn what we are to believe concerning the person of Christ; which also we may certainly do, if our minds are not perverted through prejudice, whereby the God of this world does blind the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious Gospel of Christ who is the image of God, should shine to them (2 Corinthians 4:4). Of this Word then, this Son of God it is affirmed that he was in the beginning. And this Word if it does not absolutely and formally express eternity, yet it does a preexistence to the whole creation which amounts to the same. For nothing can preexist to all creatures but in the nature of God which is eternal; unless we shall suppose a creature before the creation of any. But what is meant by this expression, the Scripture does elsewhere declare. Proverbs 8:23. I was set up from everlasting before the beginning, or ever the earth was. John 17:5. Glorify you me with your own self, with the glory which I had with you before the world was. Both which places as they explain this phrase, so also do they undeniably testify to the eternal preexistence of Christ the Son of God. And in this case we prevail against our adversaries, if we prove any preexistence of Christ to his incarnation, which as they absolutely deny, so to grant it, would overthrow their whole heresy in this matter. And therefore they know that the testimony of our Savior concerning himself, if understood in a proper intelligible sense, is perfectly destructive of their pretensions. John 8:58. Before Abraham was, I am. For although there be no proper sense in the words but a gross equivocation, if the existence of Christ before Abraham was born be not asserted in them, seeing he spoke in answer to that objection of the Jews, that he was not yet fifty years old, and so could not have seen Abraham, nor Abraham him; and the Jews that were present understood well enough that he asserted a divine preexistence to his being born so long ago, as that hereon, after their manner, they took up stones to stone him, as supposing him to have blasphemed in asserting his deity as others now do in the denying of it; yet they seeing how fatal this preexistence, though not here absolutely asserted to be eternal, would be to their cause, they contend that the meaning of the words, is, that Christ was to be the light of the world before Abraham was made the Father of many Nations. An interpretation so absurd and sottish, as never any man not infatuated by the God of this world could once admit and give countenance to.

But in the beginning, as absolutely used, is the same with From Everlasting, as it is expounded (Proverbs 8:23), and denotes an eternal existence, which is here affirmed of the Word the Son of God. But let the Word beginning, be restrained to the subject matter treated of which is the Creation of all things, and the praeexistence of Christ in his divine nature to the Creation of all things is plainly revealed and inevitably asserted. And indeed, not only the Word, but the discourse of these verses, does plainly relate to, and is expository of the first verse in the Bible (Genesis 1:1): In the beginning God created Heaven and Earth. There it is asserted that in the beginning God created all things, here, that the Word was in the beginning and made all things. This then is the least that we have obtained from this first word of our Testimony; namely, that the Word or Son of God had a personal praeexistence to the whole Creation. In what nature this must be, let these men of reason satisfy themselves, who know that Creator and Creatures, take up the whole nature of Beings; one of them he must be; and it may be well supposed that he was not a Creature before the Creation of any.

But, Secondly, Where, or with whom, was this Word in the beginning? It was says the Holy Ghost, with God. There being no creature then existing, he could be no where but with God; that is, the Father as it is expressed in one of the testimonies before going (Proverbs 8:22): The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his ways before his works of old; ver. 30. Then was I by him as one brought up with him, and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him; that is, in the beginning, this Word or Wisdom of God was with God.

And this is the same, which our Lord Jesus asserts concerning himself (John 3:13): And no man, says he, has ascended up to Heaven, but he that came down from Heaven, even the Son of man which is in Heaven. And so in other places. He affirms his being in Heaven, that is, with God, at the same time when he was in the earth; whereby he declares the immensity of his nature, and the distinction of his person; and his coming down from Heaven before he was Incarnate on the earth, declaring his preexistence; by both manifesting the meaning of this expression, that in the beginning he was with God. But hereunto they have invented a notable evasion. For although they know not well what to make of the last clause of the words, that say, then he was in Heaven when he spake on Earth; the Son of man which is in Heaven, answerable to the description of God's Immensity, do not I fill Heaven and Earth says the Lord (Jeremiah 23:27). But say, that he was there, by Heavenly meditation as another man may be; yet they give a very clear answer to what must of necessity be included in his descending from Heaven, namely his preexistence to his Incarnation. For they tell us, that before his public ministry, he was in his humane nature, (which is all they allow to him) taken up into Heaven, and there taught the Gospel; as the great Impostor Mahomet pretended he was taught his Alcoran. If you ask them, who told them so, they cannot tell; but they can tell when it was; namely, when he was led by the spirit into the Wilderness for forty days after his baptism. But yet this instance is subject to another misadventure; in that one of the Evangelists plainly affirms that he was those forty days in the Wilderness with the wild beasts (Mark 1:13). And so surely not in Heaven in the same nature by his bodily presence with God and his holy Angels.

And let me add this by the way that the interpretation of this place (John 1:1), to be mentioned afterwards; and those of the two places before mentioned (John 8:58, chap. 3:31), Faustus Socinus learned out of his Uncle Laelius's papers as he confesses, and does more than intimate that he believed he had them as it were by Revelation; and it may be so; they are indeed so forced, absurd, and irrational, that no man could ever fix upon them by any reasonable investigation. But the Author of this Revelation, if we may judge of the Parent by the Child, could be no other but the spirit of error and darkness. I suppose therefore that notwithstanding these exceptions, Christians will believe, that in the beginning the Word was with God; that is, that the Son was with the Father, as is frequently elsewhere declared.

But who was this Word? Says the Apostle, He was God. He was so with God, that is the Father, as that he himself was God also. God, in that the notion of God, which both nature, and the Scripture does represent. Not a God by office, one exalted to that dignity, (which cannot well be pretended before the Creation of the world) but as Thomas confessed him, our Lord and our God (John 20:28). Or as Paul expresses it; over all God blessed for ever; or the most high God, which these men love to deny. Let not the infidelity of men excited by the craft and malice of Satan seek for blind occasions, and this matter is determined; if the Word and Testimony of God be able to umpire a difference among the Children of men. Here is the sum of our Creed in this matter; In the beginning the Word was God; and so continues to Eternity; being Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, the Lord God Almighty.

And to show that he was so God in the beginning, as that he was distinct, one, in some thing from God the Father, by whom afterwards he was sent into the world, he adds, ver. 2. the same was in the beginning with God. Father also to evince what he has asserted, and revealed for us to believe, the Holy Ghost adds, both as a firm declaration of his Eternal Deity; and also his immediate care of the world (which how he variously exercised both in a way of providence, and grace, he afterwards declares) verse 3. All things were made by him. He was so in the beginning, before all things, as that he made them all. And that it may not be supposed, that the All that he is said to make, or create, was to be limited to any certain sort of things, he adds, that without him nothing was made that was made; which gives the first assertion an absolute universality as to its subject.

And this he further describes, v. 10. He was in the world, and the world was made by him. The world that was made, has an usual distribution in the Scripture, into the heavens and the earth, and all things contained in them; as Acts 4:24. Lord you are God which has made Heaven and Earth and the Sea, and all that in them is; that is the world, the making whereof is expressly assigned to the Son (Hebrews 1:10). You Lord in the beginning, has laid the foundation of the Earth, and the Heavens are the works of your hands. And the Apostle Paul to secure our understandings in this matter, instances in the most noble parts of the creation, and which if any might seem to be excepted from being made by him (Colossians 1:16): For by him were all things created that are in Heaven, and that are in Earth visible and invisible, whether they be Thrones, or Dominions, or Principalities, or Powers, all things were created by him and for him. The Socinians say indeed, that he made Angels to be Thrones and Principalities; that is, he gave them their order, but not their being; which is expressly contrary to the words of the text; so that a man knows not well what to say to these persons, who at their pleasure cast off the authority of God in his word: By him were all things created, that are in Heaven, and that are in Earth.

What now can be required to secure our faith in this matter? In what words possible, could a divine revelation of the eternal power and Godhead of the Son of God, be made more plain and clear to the sons of men? Or how could the truth of any thing more evidently be represented to their minds? If we understand not the mind of God, and intention of the Holy Ghost in this matter, we may utterly despair ever to come to an acquaintance with any thing that God reveals to us; or indeed with any thing else that is expressed, or is to be expressed by words. It is directly said that the Word, that is Christ, as is acknowledged by all, was with God; distinct from him, and was God, one with him; that he was so in the beginning, before the creation; that he made all things, the world, all things in Heaven and in Earth; and if he be not God, who is? The sum is, All the ways whereby we may know God, are his name, his properties, and his works. But they are all here ascribed by the Holy Ghost to the Son, to the Word; and he therefore is God, or we know neither who, nor what God is.

But say the Socinians, these things are quite otherwise, and the words have another sense in them than you imagine. What is it I pray? We bring none to them, we impose no sense upon them; we strain not any word in them, from, besides, or beyond its native, genuine signification, its constant application in the Scripture, and common use among men. What then is this latent sense that is intended, and is discoverable only by themselves? Let us hear them coining and [illegible] this sense of theirs.

First, They say that by in the beginning, is not meant of the beginning of all things, or the creation of them; but the beginning of the preaching of the Gospel. But why so I pray? Where ever these words are else used in the Scripture, they denote the beginning of all things, or eternity absolutely, or an existence preceding their creation. In the beginning God created Heaven and Earth (Genesis 1:1). I was set up from everlasting from the beginning ere ever the earth was (Proverbs 8:23). You Lord in the beginning has laid the foundations of the Earth (Hebrews 1:10). And besides, these words are never used absolutely any where for the beginning of the Gospel. There is mention made indeed of the beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Mark 1:1), which is referred to the preaching of John Baptist. But in the beginning absolutely, is never so used or applied. And they must meet with men of no small inclination to them, who will upon their desire in a matter of so great importance, forego the sense of words, which is natural and proper, fixed by its constant use in the Scripture, when applied in the same kind; for that which is forced, and strained, and not once exemplified in the whole book of God. But the words they say are to be restrained to the subject matter treated of. Well, what is that subject matter? The new creation by the preaching of the Gospel. But this is plainly false; nor will the words allow any such sense; nor the context: nor is any thing offered to give evidence to this corrupt perverting of the words, unless it be a further perverting of other testimonies, no less clear than this.

For what is according to this interpretation the meaning of those words, in the beginning was the Word? That is, when John Baptist preached, and said, this is the Lamb of God, which was signally the beginning of the Gospel, then he was. That is, he was when he was, no doubt of it. And is not this a notable way of interpreting of Scripture, which these great pretenders to a dictatorship in reason, indeed hucksters in sophistry, do make use of? But to go on with them in this supposition; how was he then with God, the Word was with God. That is, say they, he was then known only to God, before John Baptist preached him in the beginning. But what shall compel us to admit of this uncouth sense and exposition. He was with God, that is, he was known to God alone. What is their singular herein, concerning how many things may the same be affirmed? Besides, it is absolutely false. He was known to the Angel Gabriel who came to his Mother with the message of his incarnation (Luke 1:35). He was known to the two Angels which appeared to the Shepherds upon his birth (Luke 2). To all the Heavenly Host assembled to give praise and glory to God on the account of his nativity, as those who came to worship him, and to pay him the homage due to him (Luke 2:10, 13, 14). He was known to his Mother, the Blessed Virgin; and to Joseph; and Zachariah; and to Elizabeth; to Simeon and Anna, to John Baptist; and probably to many more to whom Simeon and Anna spoke of him (Luke 2:38). So that the sense pretended to be wrung out and extorted from these words, against their proper meaning and intendment, is indeed false and frivolous, and belongs not at all to them.

But let this pass. What shall we say to the next words, And the word was God. Give us leave without disturbance from you, but to believe this expression which comprizeth a Revelation of God proposed to us on purpose that we should believe it, and there will be, as was said, an end of this difference and debate. Yes, but say they, these words have another sense also. Strange! they seem to be so plain and positive, that it is impossible any other sense should be fixed on them, but only this, that the Word was in the beginning, and was God, and therefore is so still, unless he who is once God can cease so to be. But the meaning is; that afterwards, God exalted him and made him God, as to Rule, Authority and Power. This making of him God, is an expression very offensive to the ears of all sober Christians, and was therefore before exploded. And these things here, as all other figments, hang together like a rope of sands. In the beginning of the Gospel he was God, before any knew him but only God. That is, after he had preached the Gospel, and dyed, and rose again, and was exalted at the right hand of God, he was made God, and that not properly, which is absolutely impossible, but in an improper sense. How prove they then this perverse non-sense to be the sense of these plain words. They say it must needs be so. Let them believe them who are willing to perish with them.

Thus far then we have their sense; In the beginning, that is, about sixteen or seventeen hundred years ago; the Word, that is, the humane nature of Christ before it was made flesh, which it was in its being; was with God; that is, known to God alone; and in the beginning, that is afterwards, not in the Beginning, was made God; which is the summ of their exposition of this place.

But what shall we say, to what is affirmed concerning his making of all things, so as that without him, that is, without his making of it, nothing was made that was made; especially seeing that these all things are expresly said to be the world (verse 10), and all things therein contained, even in Heaven and Earth (Colossians 1:16). An ordinary man would think that they should now be taken hold of, and that there is no way of escape left to them. But they have it in a readiness. By the all things here are intended all things of the Gospel, the preaching of it, the sending of the Apostles to preach it, and to declare the Will of God; and by the world, is intended the world to come, or the new state of things under the Gospel. This is the substance of what is pleaded by the greatest masters among them in this matter, and they are not ashamed thus to plead.

And the reader in this instance may easily discern what a desperate cause they are engaged in, and how bold and desperate they are in the management of it.

First, The words are a plain illustration of the divine nature of the Word, by his divine power and works, as the very series of them declares. He was God, and he made all things; for he that made all things is God (Hebrews 3:4).

Secondly, There is no one word spoken concerning the Gospel, nor the preaching of it, nor any effects of that preaching, which the Apostle expresly insists upon and declares afterwards, verse 14, and so onwards.

Thirdly, The making of all things here ascribed to the Word, was done in the beginning. But that making of all things which they intend, in erecting the Church by the preaching of the Word, was not done in the beginning, but afterwards; most of it as themselves confess, after the Ascension of Christ into Heaven.

Fourthly, In this gloss what is the meaning of all things? Only some things say the Socinians. What is the meaning of were made? That is, were mended? by him that is the Apostles principally preaching the Gospel; and this in the beginning; after it was past; for so they say expresly that the principal things here intended, were effected by the Apostles afterwards.

I think since the beginning, place it when you will — the beginning of the world, or the beginning of the Gospel — there was never such an exposition of the word of God or man contended for.

Fifthly, It is said he made the World, and he came into it; namely, the world which he made and the World, or the inhabitants of it, knew him not. But the World they intend did know him; or the Church knew him, and acknowledged him to be the Son of God. For that was the foundation that it was built upon.

I have instanced directly in this only testimony to give the reader a pledge of the full confirmation which may be given to this great fundamental truth, by a due improvement of those other testimonies, or distinct revelations which speak no less expresly to the same purpose. And of them there is not any one, but we are ready to vindicate it, if called thereunto, from the exceptions of these men; which how bold and sophistical they are, we may in these now considered, also learn and know.

It appeareth then that there is a full sufficient revelation made in the Scripture of the eternal deity of the Son of God; and that he is so, as is the Father also. More particular testimonies I shall not at present insist upon, referring the full discussion and vindication of these truths, to another season.

We are therefore in the next place to manifest that the same, or the like testimony, is given to the deity of the Holy Spirit; that is, that he is revealed and declared in the Scripture, as the object of our faith, worship, and obedience on the account, and for the reason of those divine excellencies which are the sole reason of our yielding religious worship to any, or expecting from any the reward that is promised to us, or to be brought by them to the end for which we are. And herein, lyes as was shewed, the concernment of faith. When that knows what it is to believe as on divine revelation, and is enabled thereby to regulate the soul in its present obedience and future expectation, seeing it is its nature to work by love and hope, there it rests. Now this is done to the utmost satisfaction in the revelation that is made of the divine existence, divine excellencies, and divine operations of the Spirit as shall be briefly manifested.

But before we proceed, we may in our way observe a great congruency of success in those who have denyed the Deity of the Son, and those who have denyed that of the holy Spirit. For as to the Son, after some men began once to dis-believe the Revelation concerning him, and would not acknowledge him to be God and man in one person, they could never settle nor agree, either what, or who he was, or who was his Father, or why he was the Son. Some said he was a Phantasm or appearance; and that he had no real subsistence in this world, and that all that was done by him was an appearance, he himself being they know not what elsewhere. That proud beast Paulus Samsatenus, whose flagitious life, contended for a preheminence in wickedness with his prodigious heresies, was one of the first after the Jews, that positively contended for his being a man and no more, who was followed by Photinus and some others. The Arians perceiving the folly of this opinion, with the odium of it among all that bare the name of Christians, and that they had as good deny the whole Scripture as not grant to him a preexistence in a divine nature antecedent to his Incarnation, they framed a new Deity which God should make before the world, in all things like to himself, but not the same with him in essence and substance; but to be so like him, that by the writings of some of them, you can scarce know one from the other; and that this was the Son of God also who was afterwards incarnate. Others in the mean time had more monstrous imaginations; some that he was an Angel, some that he was the Sun, some that he was the Soul of the World, some the light within men. Departing from their proper rest, so have they hovered about, and so have they continued to do, until this day.

In the same manner it is come to pass with them who have denyed the Deity of the Holy Ghost. They could never find where to stand or abide; but one has cryed up one thing, another another. At first they observed that such things were every where ascribed to him in the Scripture, as uncontroulably evidenced him to be an intelligent voluntary Agent. This they found so plain and evident, that they could not deny, but that he was a person or an intelligent subsistence. Therefore seeing they were resolved not to assent to the Revelation of his being God, they made him a created spirit, chief and above all others. But still whatever else he were, he was only a creature. And this course some of late also have steered.

The Socinians on the other hand, observing that such things are assigned and ascribed to him, as that if they acknowledge him to be a person, or a substance, they must upon necessity admit him to be God, though they seemed not at first at all agreed what to think or say concerning him positively, yet they all concurred peremptorily in denying his personality. Hereon, some of them said he was the Gospel, which others of them have confuted; some that he was Christ. Neither could they agree whether there was one Holy Ghost or more; whether the spirit of God and the Good spirit of God, and the holy spirit, be the same or no. In general now they conclude that he is vis Dei, or virtus Dei, or efficacia Dei; no substance, but a quality that may be considered either as being in God, and then they say it is the spirit of God; or as sanctifying, and conforming men to God, and then they say, it is the Holy Ghost. Whether these things do answer the Revelation made in the Scripture concerning the Eternal Spirit of God, will be immediately manifested. Our Quakers, who have for a long season hovered up and down like a swarm of flies with a confused noise and humming, begin now to settle in the opinions lately by them declared for. But what their thoughts will fall into be, concerning the Holy Ghost, when they shall be contented to speak intelligibly, and according to the usage of other men, or the pattern of Scripture, the great rule of speaking or treating about spiritual things, I know not; and am uncertain whether they do so themselves or no. Whether he may be the light within them, or an infallible afflatus is uncertain. In the mean time, what is revealed to us in the Scripture to be believed concerning the Holy Ghost, his Deity, and personality, may be seen in the ensuing testimonies.

The sum of this Revelation is, that the Holy Spirit is an eternally divine existing substance, the Author of divine operations, and the Object of divine and religious worship; that is, over all God blessed for ever; as the ensuing testimonies evince. Genesis 1:2. The spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Psalm 33:6. By the word of the Lord were the heavens made, and all the host of them by the Spirit of his mouth.

Job 26:13. By his Spirit he has garnished the heavens.

Job 33:4. The Spirit of God has made me.

Psalm 104:30. You sendest forth your Spirit; they are created.

Matthew 28:19. Baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.

Acts 1:16. That Scripture must needs have been fulfilled which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake.

Acts 5:3. Peter said to Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lye to the Holy Ghost? Verse 4. You have not lyed to men but to God.

Acts 28:25, 26. Well spake the Holy Ghost by Esaias the Prophet to our Fathers, saying, go to this people and say—

1 Corinthians 3:16. Know you not that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you.

1 Corinthians 12:11. All these worketh that one and self-same spirit, dividing to every man as he will, 2:6. And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all.

2 Corinthians 13:14. The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Ghost be with you all.

Acts 20:28. Take heed to the flock over which the Holy Ghost has made you overseers.

Matthew 12:31. All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven to men, but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven to men.

Psalm 139:7. Whither shall I go from your Spirit?

John 14:26. But the Comforter which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things.

Luke 12:12. The Holy Ghost shall teach you in the same hour what you ought to say.

Acts 13:3. And as they ministred to the Lord and fasted; the Holy Ghost said, separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them.

Vers. 4. So they being sent forth by the Holy Ghost, departed into, &c.

2 Pet. 1:21. For the Prophecy came not in old time by the will of men, but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

It is evident upon the first consideration, that there is not any thing which we believe concerning the Holy Ghost, but that it is plainly revealed and declared in these testimonies. He is directly affirmed to be, and is called God (Acts 5:3, 4), which the Socinians will not say is by virtue of an exaltation to an office or authority, as they say of the Son. That he is an intelligent voluntary divine Agent; he knoweth, he worketh as he will, which things if in their frequent repetition, they are not sufficient to evince an intelligent Agent, a personal subsistence, that has being, life and will, we must confess that the Scripture was written on purpose to lead us into mistakes and misapprehensions of what we are under penalty of eternal ruin rightly to apprehend and believe. It declareth also, that he is the Author and Worker of all sorts of divine operations requiring immensity, omnipotency, omnisciency, and all other divine excellencies to their working and effecting. Moreover, it is revealed, that he is peculiarly to be believed in; and may peculiarly be sinned against; the great Author of all grace in believers, and order in the Church. This is the sum of what we believe of what is revealed in the Scripture concerning the Holy Ghost.

As in the consideration of the preceding head, we vindicated one testimony in particular from the exceptions of the adversaries of the truth, so on this we may briefly sum up the evidence that is given us in the testimonies before produced, that the Reader may the more easily understand their intendment, and what in particular, they bear witness to.

The sum is, that the Holy Ghost is a divine distinct person, and neither merely the power or virtue of God, nor any created Spirit whatever. This plainly appears from what is revealed concerning him. For he who is placed in the same series or order with other divine persons, without the least note of difference or distinction from them, as to an interest in personality, who has the names proper to a divine person only, and is frequently and directly called by them, who also has personal properties, and is the voluntary Author of personal divine operations, and the proper object of divine worship, he is a distinct divine person. And if these things be not a sufficient evidence and demonstration of a divine intelligent substance, I shall, as was said before, despair to understand any thing that is expressed and declared by words. But now thus it is with the Holy Ghost according to the revelation made concerning him in the Scripture.

First, He is placed in the same rank and order without any note of difference or distinction as to a distinct interest in the divine nature, that is, as we shall see, personality, with other divine persons (Matthew 28:19): Baptizing them in the name of the Father, and the Son, and of the Holy Ghost (1 John 5:7): There be three that bear witness in Heaven, the Father, the Son, and the Spirit, and these three are one (1 Corinthians 12:3, 4, 5, 6): No man can say the Lord Jesus Christ is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost; now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit, and there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord; and there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all. Neither does a denial of his divine being and distinct existence leave any tolerable sense to these expressions. For read the words of the first place from the mind of the Socinians, and see what it is can be gathered from them: Baptizing them, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the virtue or efficacy of the Father. Can any thing be more absonant from faith and reason, than this absurd expression? And yet is it the direct sense, if it be any, that these men put upon the words. To join a quality with acknowledged persons, and that in such things and cases, as wherein they are proposed under a personal consideration, is a strange kind of mystery. And the like may be manifested concerning the other places.

Secondly, He also has the names proper to a divine person only. For he is expressly called God (Acts 5): He who is termed the Holy Ghost (ver. 3), and the Spirit of the Lord (verse 9), is called also God (ver. 4). Now this is the name of a divine person on one account or other. The Socinians would not allow Christ to be called God, were he not a divine person, though not by nature, yet by office and authority. And I suppose, they will not find out an office for the Holy Ghost whereunto he might be exalted on the account whereof he might become God, seeing this would acknowledge him to be a person which they deny. So he is called the Comforter (John 16:7), a personal appellation this is also; and because he is the Comforter of all God's people, it can be the name of none but a divine person. In the [illegible] it is frequently [illegible] come, that he shall, and will do such and such things, all of them declaring him to be a person.

Thirdly, He has personal properties assigned to him, as a will (1 Corinthians 12:11): He divideth to every man severally as he will; and understanding (1 Corinthians 2:10): The Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. As also all the actings that are ascribed to him are all of them such, as undeniably affirm personal properties in their principle and Agent.

Fourthly, He is the voluntary Author of divine operations. He of old cherished the creation (Genesis 1:3). The Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. He formed and garnished the heavens. He inspired, acted and spoke, in and by the Prophets (Acts 28:25, 26). Well spoke the Holy Ghost by Isaiah the Prophet to our Fathers (2 Peter 1:21). The prophecy came not in old time by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. He regenerates, enlightens, sanctifies, comforts, instructs, leads, guides, all the disciples of Christ, as the Scriptures every where testify. Now all these are personal operations, and cannot with any pretence of sobriety or consistency with reason be constantly and uniformly assigned to a quality or virtue. He is, as the Father and Son, God with the properties of omniscience and omnipotency, of life, understanding and will; and by these properties, works, acts, and produces effects according to wisdom, choice, and power.

Fifthly, The same regard is had to him in faith, worship, and obedience, as to the other persons of the Father and Son. For our being baptized into his name, is our solemn engagement to believe in him, to yield obedience to him, and to worship him, as it puts the same obligation upon us to the Father and the Son. So also in reference to the worship of the Church. He commands that the Ministers of it be separated to himself (Acts 13:2). The Holy Ghost said, separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them. Ver. 4. So they being sent forth by the Holy Ghost departed, which is comprehensive of all the religious worship of the Church.

And on the same account is he sinned against, as Acts 5:3, 4, 9. For there is the same reason of sin and obedience. Against whom a man may sin formally and ultimately, him he is bound to obey, worship, and believe in. And this can be no quality, but God himself. For what may be the sense of this expression: You have lied to the efficacy of God in his operations; or how can we be formally obliged to obedience to a quality. There must then an antecedent obligation to faith, trust, and religious obedience be supposed as the ground of rendering a person capable of being guilty of sin towards any. For sin is but a failure in faith, obedience or worship. These therefore are due to the Holy Ghost; or a man could not sin against him so signally and fatally as some are said to do, in the foregoing testimonies.

I say therefore to this part of our cause, as to the other, that unless we will cast off all reverence of God, and in a kind of Atheism, which as I suppose the prevailing wickedness of this age has not yet arrived to, say that the Scriptures were written on purpose to deceive us, and to lead us into mistakes about, and misapprehensions of what it proposes to us, we must acknowledge the Holy Ghost to be a substance, a person, God; yet distinct from the Father and the Son. For to tell us, that he will come to us, that he will be our Comforter, that he will teach us, lead us, guide us, that he spoke of old, in and by the Prophets, that they were moved by him, acted by him, that he searches the deep things of God, works as he will, that he appoints to himself Ministers in the Church; in a word, to declare in places innumerable, what he has done, what he does, what he will do, what he says, and speaks, how he acts, and proceeds, what his will is, and to warn us, that we grieve him not, sin not against him, with things innumerable of the like nature, and all this while to oblige us to believe that he is not a person, a helper, a comforter, a searcher, a willer, but a quality in some especial operations of God, or his power and virtue in them, were to distract men, not to instruct them, and leave them no certain conclusion but this, that there is nothing certain in the whole Book of God. And of no other tendency are these and the like imaginations of our adversaries in this matter.

But let us briefly consider what is objected in general to the truth we have confirmed.

First, They say, the Holy Spirit is said to be given, to be sent, to be bestowed on men, and to be promised to them; and therefore it cannot be that he should be God; for how can any of these things be spoken of God.

I answer, As these expressions do not prove him to be God, nor did ever any produce them to that purpose, yet they undeniably prove him to be a person; or an intelligent voluntary Agent, concerning whom they are spoken and affirmed. For how can the power of God, or a quality as they speak, be said to be sent, to be given, to be bestowed on men; so that these very expressions are destructive to their imaginations.

Secondly, He who is God equal in nature and being with the Father, may be promised, sent, and given, with respect to the holy dispensation and condescension wherein he has undertaken the office of being our Comforter and Sanctifier.

Thirdly, The communications, distributions, impartings, divisions of the spirit, which they mention, as they respect the object of them, or those on whom they were, or are bestowed, denote only works, gifts, operations and effects of the spirit, the rule whereof is expressed (1 Corinthians 12:7). He works them in whom he will, and as he will. And whether these, and the like exceptions, taken from actings and operations, which are plainly interpreted and explained in sundry places of Scripture, and evidently enough in the particular places where they are used, are sufficient to impeach the truth of the revelation before declared, all who have a due reverence of God, his word and truths, will easily understand and discern.

These things being declared in the Scripture concerning the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, it is moreover revealed, and these three are one; that is, one God, jointly to be worshipped, feared, adored, believed in and obeyed, in order to eternal life. For although this does absolutely and necessarily follow from what is declared and has been spoken concerning the one God, or oneness of the Deity, yet for the confirmation of our faith, and that we may not by the distinct consideration of the three be taken off from the one, it is particularly declared, that these three are one, that one, the one and same God. But whereas, as was said before, this can no otherwise be, the testimonies given thereunto are not so frequently multiplied as they are to those other heads of this truth, which through the craft of Satan, and the pride of men, might be more liable to exceptions. But yet they are clear, full, and distinctly sufficient for faith to acquiesce in immediately, without any other expositions, interpretations, or arguments, beyond our understanding of the naked importance of the words. Such are they, of the Father the Son (John 10:30): I and my Father are one. Father, Son and Spirit (John 5:7): three that bare witness in Heaven, Father, Son and Spirit, and these three are one (Matthew 28:19): Baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Spirit. For if those into whose name we are baptized be not one in nature, we are by our Baptism engaged into the service and worship of more Gods than one. For as being baptized, or sacredly initiated into, or in the name of any one does sacramentally bind us to a holy and religious obedience to him, and in all things to the avowing of him as the God whose we are, and whom we serve, as here we are in the name of the Father, Son and Spirit, so if they are not one God, the blasphemous consequence before mentioned must unavoidably be admitted; which it also does upon the Socinian principle, who while of all others they seem to contend most for one God, are indeed direct polytheists, by owning others with religious respect, due to God alone, which are not so.

Once more! it is revealed also, that these three are distinct among themselves by certain peculiar relative properties, if I may yet use these terms. So that they are distinct, living, divine, intelligent voluntary principles of operation or working, and that in, and by internal acts one towards another, and in acts that outwardly respect the creation and the several parts of it. Now this distinction originally lies in this; that the Father begets the Son, and the Son is begotten of the Father; and the Holy Spirit proceeds from both of them. The manner of these things, so far as they may be expressed to our edification, shall afterwards be spoken to. At present it suffices for the satisfaction and confirmation of our faith, that the distinctions named are clearly revealed in the Scripture, and are proposed to be its proper object in this matter. Psalm 2:7: You are my Son, this day have I begotten you. Matthew 16:16: You are Christ, the Son of the living God. John 1:14: We saw his glory, the glory of the only begotten of the Father. Verse 18: No man has seen God at any time, the only begotten Son which is in the bosom of the Father he has revealed him. John 5:26: For as the Father has life in himself, so has he given to the Son to have life in himself. 1 John 5:20: The Son of God is come, and has given us an understanding. John 14:26: But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send to you from the Father even the spirit of truth which proceeds from the Father, he shall testify of me.

Now as the nature of this distinction lies in their mutual relation one to another, so it is the foundation of those distinct actings and operations, whereby the distinction itself is clearly manifested and confirmed. And these actings as was said, are either such, as where one of them is the object of another's actings, or such as have the creature for their objects. The first sort are testified to (Psalm 110:1; John 1:18; chapter 5:20; chapter 17:5; 1 Corinthians 2:10, 11; Proverbs 8:21, 22), most of which places have been before recited. They, which thus know each other, love each other, delight in each other, must needs be distinct; and so are they represented to our faith. And for the other sort of actings the Scripture is full of the expressions of them; see Genesis 19:24; Zechariah 2:8; John 5:17; 1 Corinthians 12:7, 8, 9; 1 Corinthians 8:9.

Our conclusion from the whole is; that there is nothing more fully expressed in the Scripture, than this sacred truth is; that there is one God, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost; which are divine, distinct, intelligent, voluntary, omnipotent principles of operation, and working, which whoever thinks himself obliged to believe the Scripture must believe; and concerning others, in this discourse, we are not solicitous.

This is that which was first proposed; namely, to manifest what is expressly revealed in the Scripture concerning God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost; so as that we may duly believe in him, yield obedience to him, enjoy communion with him, walk in his love and fear, and so come at length to be blessed with him for evermore. Nor does faith for its security, establishment and direction, absolutely stand in need of any farther exposition or explanation of these things; or the use of any terms not consecrated to the present service by the Holy Ghost. But whereas it may be variously assaulted by the temptations of Satan, and opposed by the subtle sophisms of men of corrupt minds; and whereas it is the duty of the disciples of Christ to grow in the knowledge of God, and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, by an explicit apprehension of the things they do believe, so far as they are capable of them; this doctrine has in all ages of the Church, been explained and taught, in and by such expressions, terms, and propositions, as farther declare what is necessarily included in it, or consequent to it; with an exclusion of such things, notions, and apprehensions, as are neither the one, nor the other. This I shall briefly manifest, and then vindicate the whole from some exceptions, and so close this dissertation.

That God is One, was declared and proved. Now this Oneness can respect nothing but the Nature, Being, Substance or Essence of God. God is one in this respect. Some of these words indeed are not used in the Scripture. But whereas they are of the same importance and signification, and none of them include any thing of imperfection, they are properly used in the declaration of the Unity of the Godhead. There is mention in the Scripture of the Godhead of God (Romans 1:20): His Eternal power and Godhead. And of his Nature, by excluding them from being objects of our worship, who are not God by nature (Galatians 4:8). Now this natural Godhead of God, is, his Substance or Essence with all the holy divine excellencies which naturally and necessarily appertain thereunto. Such are Eternity, Immensity, Omnipotency, Life, Infinite Holiness, Goodness, and the like. This one Nature, Substance or Essence, being the Nature, Substance, or Essence of God, as God, is the Nature, Essence and Substance of the Father, Son, and Spirit, one and the same absolutely in and to each of them. For none can be God as they are revealed to be, but by virtue of this divine Nature or Being. Herein consists the Unity of the Godhead.

Secondly, the distinction which the Scripture reveals between Father, Son, and Spirit is that whereby they are three [illegible] or Persons, distinctly subsisting in the same divine Essence or Being. Now a divine person, is nothing but the divine Essence upon the account of an especial property, subsisting in an especial manner. As in the Person of the Father, there is the Divine Essence, and Being, with its property of begetting the Son, subsisting in an especial manner as the Father. And because this Person has the whole Divine Nature, all the essential properties of that nature are in that person. The wisdom, the understanding of God, the will of God, the Immensity of God, is in that person; not as that Person, but as the Person is God. The like is to be said of the Persons of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. Hereby each Person having the understanding, the will, and power of God, becomes a distinct principle of operation; and yet all their actings ad extra being the actings of God, they are undivided, and are all the works of one, of the self same God. And these things do not only necessarily follow, but are directly included in the Revelation made concerning God, and his subsistence in the Scriptures.

There are indeed very many other things that are taught, and disputed, about this doctrine of the [illegible] Trinity, as the manner of the eternal Generation of the Son, of the Essence of the Father; of the procession of the Holy Ghost, and the difference of it from the Generation of the Son; of the mutual in-being of the persons, by reason of their unity in the same Substance or Essence; the nature of their personal subsistence, with respect to the properties whereby they are mutually distinguished, all which are true and defensible against all the Sophisms of the adversaries of this truth. Yet because the distinct apprehension of them, and their accurate expression, is not necessary to faith, as it is our guide and principle in and to religious worship and obedience, they need not here be insisted on. Nor are those brief explications themselves before mentioned, so proposed as to be placed immediately in the same rank or order with the Original Revelations before insisted on, but only are pressed as proper expressions of what is revealed to increase our light and further our edification. And although they cannot rationally be opposed or denied, nor ever were by any, but such as deny and oppose the things themselves as revealed, yet they that do so deny or oppose them, are to be required positively in the first place to deny or disapprove the Oneness of the Deity, or to prove that the Father, or Son, or Holy Ghost in particular, are not God, before they be allowed to speak one word against the manner of the explication of the truth concerning them. For either they grant the Revelation declared and contended for, or they do not: if they do; let that concession be first laid down, namely, that the Father, Son, and Spirit are one God; and then let it be debated whether they are one in Substance and three in Persons, or how else the matter is to be stated. If they deny it; it is a plain madness to dispute of the manner of any thing, and the way of expressing it, while the thing itself is denied to have a being: for of that which is not, there is neither manner, property, adjunct, nor effect. Let then such persons, as this sort of men are ready to attempt with their Sophistry, and to amuse with cavils about persons, substances, subsistences, and the like, desire to know of them what it is that they would be at. What would they deny, what would they disapprove. Is it that God is one; or that the Father is God, or the Son, or the Holy Ghost is so. If they deny, or oppose either of these, they have testimonies and instances of divine Revelation, or may have, in a readiness, to confound the Devil and all his Emissaries. If they will not do so, if they refuse it, then let them know, that it is most foolish and unreasonable to contend about expressions and explanations of any thing, or doctrine, about the manner, respects, or relations of any thing, until the thing itself, or doctrine, be plainly confessed or denied. If this they refuse, as generally they do and will, which I speak upon sufficient experience, and will not be induced to deal openly, properly and rationally, but will keep to their cavils and Sophisms, about terms and expressions, all further debate, or conference with them, may justly, and ought both conscientiously and rationally to be refused, and rejected. For these sacred mysteries of God and the Gospel, are not lightly to be made the subject of men's contests and disputations.

But as we dealt before in particular, so here I shall give instances of the sophistical exceptions that are used against the whole of this doctrine; and that with respect to some late collections, and representations of them: from where they are taken up and used by many who seem not to understand the words, phrases and expressions themselves, which they make use of.

The sum of what they say in general, is, How can these things be? How can three be one, and one be three? Every person has its own substance, and therefore if there be three persons, there must be three substances; and so three Gods.

Answ. 1. Every person has distinctly its own substance, for the one substance of the Deity, is the substance of each person, so it is still but one. But each person has not its own distinct substance, because the substance of them all is the same, as has been proved.

2. They say, That if each person be God, then each person is Infinite, and there being three persons there must be three Infinites.

Answ. This follows not in the least; for each person is Infinite as he is God. All divine properties, such as to be Infinite is, belong not to the persons on the account of their personality, but on the account of their nature, which is one, for they are all natural properties.

But they say, If each person be God, and that God subsist in three persons, then in each person there are three persons or Gods.

Answ. The collusion of this Sophism consists in that expression, be God; and that God; in the first place, the nature of God is intended; in the latter a singular person. Place the words intelligibly and they are thus; If each person be God, and the nature of God subsists in three persons, then in each person there are three persons; and then the folly of it will be evident.

But they farther infer; That if we deny the persons to be Infinite, then an Infinite Being has a finite mode of subsisting, and so I know not what supposition they make hence; that seeing there are not three Infinites, then the Father, Son, and Spirit are three finites that make up an Infinite.

The pitiful weakness of this Cavil is open to all: for finite and Infinite are properties and adjuncts of Beings, and not of the manner of the subsistence of any thing. The nature of each person is Infinite, and so is each person, because of that nature. Of the manner of their subsistence, finite and Infinite cannot be predicated or spoken, no farther than to say, an Infinite Being does so subsist.

But you grant, say they, that the only true God is the Father, and then if Christ be the only true God, he is the Father.

Answ. We say, the only true God is Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. We never say, the Scripture never says, that the Father only is the true God, from where it would follow, that he that is the true God, is the Father. But we grant the Father to be the only true God: and so is the Son also. And it does not at all from there follow, that the Son is the Father. Because in saying the [illegible] the true God, we respect not his paternity, or his paternal relation to his Son; but his nature, essence and being. And the same we affirm concerning the other persons. And to say, that because each person is God, one person must be another, is to crave leave to disbelieve what God has revealed, without giving any reason at all for their so doing.

But this Sophism being borrowed from another, namely Crellius, who insisted much upon it, I shall upon his account, and not on theirs, who as far as I can apprehend, understand little of the intendment of it, remove it more fully out of the way. It is proposed by him in way of Syllogism, thus, The only true God is the Father; Christ is the only true God; therefore he is the Father. Now this Syllogism is ridiculously Sophystical. For in a Categorical Syllogism the Major Proposition is not to be particular, nor equipollent to a particular. For from such a Proposition, when any thing communicable to more is the subject of it, and is restrained to one particular, nothing can be inferred in the conclusion. But such is this Proposition here, the only true God is the Father. It is a particular Proposition; wherein the subject is restrained to a singular, or individual predicate, though in it self communicable to more. Now the Proposition being so made particular, the terms of the subject or predicate are supposed reciprocal; namely, that one God, and the Father, are the same; which is false: Unless it be first proved, that the name God, is communicable to no more, or no other, than is the other term of Father; which to suppose, is to begg the whole Question. For the only true God, has a larger signification than the term of Father, or Son. So that though the only true God be the Father, yet every one who is true God, is not the Father: Seeing then that the name of God here, supplies the place of a species, though it be singular absolutely, as it respects the Divine Nature which is absolutely singular, and one, and cannot be multiplied; yet in respect of communication it is otherwise, it is communicated to more, namely, to the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. And therefore if any thing be intended to be concluded from hence, the Proposition must be expressed according to what the subject requires, as capable of communication or Attribution to more than one, as thus; whoever is the only true God, is the Father; which Proposition these Persons and their Masters, shall never be able to prove.

I have given in particular these strictures thus briefly, upon these empty Sophisms; partly, because they are well removed already, and partly because they are mere exscriptions out of an Author not long since translated into English, to whom an entire answer may ere long be returned.

That which at present shall suffice, is to give a general answer to all these cavills, with all of the same kind, which the men of these principles do usually insist upon.

I. The things, they say, which we teach concerning the Trinity, are contrary to Reason; and thereof they endeavour to give sundry instances, wherein the summ of the opposition which they make to this truth does consist. But first, I ask what Reason is it that they intend? It is their own, the carnal reason of men. By that they will judge of these Divine Mysteries. The Scripture tells us indeed, that the Spirit of a man which is in him knows the things of a man. A man's Spirit, by natural Reason, may judge of natural things. But the things of God, knoweth no man but the spirit of God (1 Corinthians 2:11). So that what we know of these things, we must receive upon the Revelation of the Spirit of God merely; if the Apostle may be believed. And it is given to men to know the Mysteries of the Kingdom of God. To some, and not to others; and unless it be so given them they cannot know them. In particular, none can know the Father, unless the Son reveal him. Nor will, or does, or can, flesh and blood reveal or understand Jesus Christ to be the Son of the living God, unless the Father reveal him, and instruct us in the truth of it (Matthew 16:18). The way to come to the acknowledgement of these things, is that described by the Apostle (Ephesians 3:14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19): "For this cause I bow my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, of whom the whole family in Heaven and Earth is named, that he would grant you, according to the riches of his glory, to be strengthned with might by his Spirit in the inner man; that Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith; that you being rooted and grounded in love may be able to comprehend with all Saints, &c." As also (Colossians 2:2): "That you might come to all riches of the full assurance of understanding, to the acknowledgement of the Mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ. In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge." It is by faith and prayer, and through the Revelation of God, that we may come to the acknowledgement of these things; and not by the carnal reasonings of men of corrupt minds.

2. What Reason do they intend? If Reason absolutely, the Reason of things; we grant that nothing contrary to it, is to be admitted. But Reason as it is in this or that man, particularly in themselves, we know to be weak, maimed and imperfect; and that they are, and all other men, extremely remote from a just and full comprehension of the whole Reason of things. Are they in such an estate, as that their apprehension shall pass for the measure of the nature of all things; we know they are far from it. So that though we will not admit of any thing, that is contrary to reason, yet the least intimation of a Truth by Divine Revelation, will make me embrace it, although it should be contrary to the reason of all the Socinians in the world. Reason in the abstract, or the just measure of the answering of one thing to another, is of great moment. But Reason, that is, what is pretended to be so, or appears to be so to this or that man, especially in and about things of Divine Revelation, is of very small importance; of none at all where it riseth up against the express testimonies of Scripture, and these multiplyed to their mutual confirmation and explanation.

3. Many things are above Reason, that is, as considered in this or that subject, as men, which are not at all against it. It is an easie thing to compel the most curious enquirers of these days to a ready confession hereof, by multitudes of instances in things finite and temporary. And shall any dare to deny but it may be so, in things Heavenly, Divine, and Spiritual? Nay, there is no concernment of the Being of God, or his properties, but is absolutely above the comprehension of our reason. We cannot by searching find out God, we cannot find out the Almighty to perfection.

4. The very foundation of all their objections and cavils against this truth, is destructive of as fundamental principles of reason, as are in the world. They are all at best reduced to this; it cannot be thus in things finite; the same Being cannot in one respect be one, in another three, and the like, and therefore it is so in things Infinite. All these reasonings are built upon this supposition, that that which is finite can perfectly comprehend that which is Infinite. An assertion absurd, foolish and contradictory to it self! Again, it is the highest reason in things of pure Revelation, to captivate our understandings to the Authority of the Revealer, which here is rejected. So that by a loud specious pretence of Reason, these men by a little captious Sophistry endeavour not only to countenance their unbelief, but to evert the greatest principles of Reason it self.

5. The objections these men principally insist upon, are merely against the explanations we use of this doctrine; not against the Primitive Revelation of it, which is the principal object of our faith, which how preposterous and irrational a course of proceeding it is, has been declared.

6. It is a rule among Philosophers; that if a man on just grounds and reasons have embraced any opinion or persuasion, he is not to desert it, merely because he cannot answer every objection against it. For if the objections wherewith we may be entangled, be not of the same weight and importance, with the reason on which we embraced the opinion, it is a madness to forego it on the account thereof. And much more must this hold among the common sort of Christians, in things spiritual and divine. If they will let go, and part with their faith in any truth, because they are not able to answer distinctly some objections that may be made against it, they may quickly find themselves disputed into Atheism.

7. There is so great an intimation made of such an expression, and resemblance of a Trinity in Unity, in the very works of the Creation, as learned men have manifested by various instances, that it is most unreasonable to suppose that to be contrary to reason, which many objects of rational consideration, do more or less present to our minds.

8. To add no more considerations of this nature; let any of the adversaries produce any one argument or grounds of reason, or those pretended to be such, against that that has been asserted, that has not already been baffled a thousand times, and it shall receive an answer, or a public acknowledgement that it is Indissoluble.