Sermon 34: 1 Samuel 10:8-13

Scripture referenced in this chapter 3

8. 'And you shall go down before me to Gilgal (for I will come down to you) to offer burnt offerings and to sacrifice peace offerings. Seven days you shall wait until I come to you and show you what you shall do.' 9. And so when he had turned his shoulder to depart from Samuel, God changed his heart into another, and all these signs came to pass on that day. 10. And they came to the aforesaid hill, and behold, a company of prophets met him, and the Spirit of the Lord rushed upon him, and he prophesied in their midst. 11. And when all who had known him yesterday and the day before saw that he was with the prophets and was prophesying, they said to one another: 'What has happened to the son of Kish? Is Saul also among the prophets?' 12. And one answered another, saying: 'And who is their father?' Therefore it became a proverb: 'Is Saul also among the prophets?' 13. And he ceased prophesying and came to the high place.

After Samuel had exhorted Saul to commit himself entirely to God, to comply with his will, and to overcome every difficulty, he now instructs him to come to Gilgal to offer sacrifice, and to wait there seven days until he himself should come and show him what needed to be done. From this it appears how God began to work in certain stages, yet did not choose to complete his work on the first occasion. For as far as the kingdom is concerned, God could have raised Saul to the royal throne from the very beginning, or made it so evident by certain and indubitable signs that he would be received by all without delay or difficulty. But on the contrary, God willed that what he had foretold through Samuel about the kingdom should remain hidden, and that no one should know of it, because the time had not yet come. As for the instruction necessary for Saul, he was taught only in part. But why did God not complete his work immediately? It is not for us to impose a law on God or to prescribe to him the method of his ways. God could indeed have created the world in an instant, and yet he spent six days constructing it, though by a single nod he could have accomplished what he had resolved within himself. For since he is omnipotent and has all things in his hand, nothing can cause him delay; but nonetheless he proceeds step by step, and he does this specifically for the sake of human beings. Hence the arrogance of men is astonishing and monstrous, who in a way contend with God because he does not proceed in his works according to their judgment and imagination, and does not accomplish what they have conceived, not considering that God acts in this way to accommodate himself to their weakness. Therefore this passage is worthy of singular observation, when it is said that Saul must be further instructed by Samuel. And indeed at the beginning of this chapter we saw Saul called aside by Samuel and made aware of God's will — but only in part, which is why he now prescribes another time for him when he is to be further taught. And this must be applied to our use: let us not be annoyed that in God's school we do not progress so much as to become wise in an instant, but rather let us rejoice to be counted among the number of disciples. For indeed God could in an instant infuse into each of the faithful so great a knowledge of his truth that all would be prophets, all would be teachers, before they had been taught in the schools. But it has pleased him to deal with us in such a way that throughout the whole course of our life we learn in such a manner that much ignorance still remains in us, so that we may be kept within the bounds of modesty. Therefore we must take care not to bear with annoyance and indignation what pleases God and is also useful for us. From these words, then, by which Saul is commanded to come to Gilgal and there await the prophet, to be more fully taught by him, this doctrine is necessary for us to draw out. But why, furthermore, does Samuel not then appear at the appointed time? Was this waiting perhaps superfluous? Certainly it was necessary for Saul's obedience to be tested. Indeed God himself kept Samuel in suspense, although he had revealed to him his will and what he had decreed within himself. And indeed he used his ministry so that Saul might be designated as king to the people; but nonetheless he did not yet wish that designation to be fulfilled. Therefore Saul had to restrain himself and patiently wait until the time prescribed by God had arrived, and not talk back, lest he overstep the bounds of modesty and obedience. From this, then, let us learn to place times and opportunities in God's hand; and if we are tickled by our desires and are impatient of delay, let us put a bridle on ourselves and patiently await the Lord's will, by which he may complete the work he has begun. Moreover, Samuel says he will come to offer burnt offerings and to sacrifice peace offerings. The Hebrew word is often expressed by the word 'pacific' [peace offerings], but the word 'peace' among the Hebrews encompasses all prosperity. Such offerings and peace sacrifices were offered either when they had experienced divine help in difficult and adverse circumstances, or when they had won a victory over enemies, or when a private individual had been delivered from a disease or some notable calamity — so that by such peace and thanksgiving sacrifices they might give thanks to God and publicly profess that all prosperous and happy things flowed from his hand and generosity. Here, however, a burnt offering was also added to the peace offerings, because God had commanded Samuel to give the people a king by whom they would henceforth be governed; for which reason sacrifices as a burnt offering had to be made to God. From this we learn that divine promises are to be used in such a way that we do not thereby become more negligent and sluggish in doing our duty, but rather more ardent in calling upon God. Many fanatical people indeed, having been made certain of God's help, act more carelessly, as though, since God has spoken, they no longer need to trouble themselves about anything. Others think they are wasting their effort if they pray to God and ask in prayer for things which he has already decreed within himself in his secret counsel; and they think that we can neither be helped nor escape harm by our prayers. All the more must this doctrine be observed: that having been made certain of God's will, we should not on that account think we may grow sluggish, nor should our faith grow weaker, but rather we should be all the more sharpened and stirred to prayer. Therefore, although we rely on God's promises, we will not on that account invoke him less, but rather, persuaded of his will and power toward us, we will hope that he will fulfill his promises while we nonetheless importune him with our prayers. For these things cohere in an inseparable bond: namely, the prayers of the faithful and God's beneficence, by which from pure grace and generosity he bestows upon us whatever benefits we have, without any regard for any worthiness of ours, but from his singular love toward us; and he finally also joins us to himself, so that we become one with him. For this reason the prophet says in the Psalm: 'God complies with the will of those who fear him.' From which God's immense love toward us appears — not only accomplishing whatever pertains to our salvation, but also conforming himself to our will. 'You have asked,' says the Lord, 'therefore it shall be done for you.' But we who have experienced such familiarity of God toward us, what kind of people ought we to be? With what zeal should we be inflamed? With what fervent prayers should we invoke him?

And let this much be said about that sacrifice which Samuel was going to offer to the Lord at Gilgal: so that, although he had already been made certain of his will, he might nonetheless urge God by prayers to the fulfillment of the promise, and openly profess that this whole matter depended on his will. Meanwhile, let us observe that the prayers of all the saints were founded on God's promises, since no access to God would be open to us unless he himself, coming before us first, opened the way and led us to himself, as it were, by the hand. And this must be more deeply impressed on our minds: that when we are about to pray to God, we should know that we will have access to him by no other means than by relying on his promises. There follows: that Samuel would then show Saul what he was to do. By these words what we taught in the previous sermon is confirmed, namely that when Samuel told Saul to do what should come to his hand, he did not give him permission to rashly undertake whatever he wished from his own judgment, or anything whatever rashly; but he warned him that since he had God as his author, he should securely and fearlessly seize the opportunities offered for action. Therefore, although he commands him to do what comes to hand, he does not thereby give him free rein to do everything according to his whim and desire. For here we see Saul restrained from undertaking anything without being more fully taught by Samuel. Therefore, although, as we taught above, he had been made certain of God's will, he was nevertheless taught only in part, and hence he needed to be further instructed and to progress more and more in it. For this reason we also see this Saul here — though already designated as king and persuaded by certain signs about obtaining the kingdom — nevertheless submitting himself to the authority and teaching of the prophet. From which we gather that the word of God does not pertain only to people of the lowest condition, but even those placed in the highest rank and degree must be subject to it, so that no one can withdraw himself from its authority. I confess indeed that Saul had not yet been raised to the royal throne, and that God's decree about him had not yet been published; nevertheless, it is beyond doubt that he had been made certain of his election, and yet Samuel commands him to wait until it should be made known to him what he was to do. From this, then, let us learn that no one is permitted to withdraw himself from the Lord's school, but that people of every order and dignity must willingly submit themselves to it and make progress in his school. Especially in difficult and arduous matters, the word of God must serve as a certain torch shining in the darkness, as the prophet admonishes in Psalm 119, and as guides, so that we undertake nothing except under its leadership. Therefore we should not promise ourselves so much from the powers of our own intellect that we undertake or hope to accomplish anything from ourselves, but we must use his commandments as counselors and depend entirely on them.

Next it is said that when Saul had turned his shoulders — that is, when he had departed from Samuel — he was changed by God and his heart was transformed into another, and the signs occurred that had been predicted. But specific mention is made of the last sign, because it was most relevant to the confirmation of the promised kingdom to be obtained, as we taught before. As for that transformation, we have already said that it was thus demonstrated that Saul was not fit in himself for administering the kingdom and sustaining so great a burden — namely, the governance of the people — unless God himself lent his hand. This the Lord willed to be made known to Saul himself from the beginning, so that he would recognize Samuel to be truly the instrument of God and the minister of the Holy Spirit, without whose prompting and command he would undertake nothing, since his prophecy was confirmed by such certain and indubitable signs. And it should especially be noted that his heart is said to have been changed, because the Holy Spirit rushed upon him. By these words it is signified that he was endowed with an extraordinary power. So we see David asking for a new spirit, which he confesses in Psalm 51 that he had, as it were, lost through his own fault, and praying to God to restore the spirit which he acknowledges was taken from him for a time. Therefore let us know that God bestows his Spirit when circumstances so require, and likewise takes it away in turn because of our ingratitude. By nature indeed, I confess, some are adorned with more excellent gifts than others, but here we are speaking of a special and particular gift, when the Spirit of God is said to have rushed upon him. Namely, Saul, who was previously less fit and suitable, when the Spirit came upon him in a certain new and unusual manner, would perceive the presence of the Spirit by a certain visible sign, and an incredible change would take place in him — as indeed happened afterward. Therefore, when we need knowledge, let us remember that we must take refuge in the Lord; indeed, even if it has happened that we were previously stripped of it through our own fault, let us not doubt that at the opportune time God will restore it to those who ask it of him. Nor indeed should we doubt that when he calls us to any office, he will supply the necessary strength — provided we, distrusting our own powers, place all our confidence in him — and that even though we are weak and feeble, he will make us equal to bearing the burden he himself has laid upon us. For the benefit that was bestowed on Saul by the Lord he promises to all those whom he calls to any function, whether civil or ecclesiastical: that whether for governing peoples or for teaching the church, he will make those fit whom it has pleased him to call to this or that office. There is no doubt, therefore, that God also bestows the grace to perform whatever office he calls someone to — provided, however, that they, conscious of their own insufficiency, weakness, and poverty, have recourse to him as the fountain of all good and expect from him whatever they lack.

There follows that when Saul came to the hill, he encountered that company of prophets. The other signs are passed over in silence — namely, the meeting with those two men coming from the father's house and reporting that the donkeys had been found, and the three men going up to sacrifice — because the repetition of those would not be of such great importance. But the fact that Saul, filled with the Spirit of God and prophesying, was made certain by this visible sign of his extraordinary calling to that higher rank of dignity, and because that sudden change was of great importance — for this reason the meeting with the prophets is specifically recounted here. We said above that those prophets were men who exercised themselves in the law of God, who would be the future seedbed of the church, who would show the way of salvation to the whole people, lest the church should one day be deprived of teachers; so that although not all were experts in the law, the splendor of all knowledge would not be entirely extinguished, since there were no schools elsewhere in which some might be prepared to expound the knowledge of the divine law. And indeed it is specifically said that the Spirit of God rushed upon Saul, and that he prophesied among them. Here we must note that Paul teaches that the Spirit in the sacred writings bears various titles. For sometimes he is called the Spirit of truth, so that we may learn that there is nothing but falsehood in human beings, but truth in God alone; sometimes the Spirit of fortitude, of constancy, of fear, of wisdom, of gentleness. These are indeed diverse names by which the Spirit of God is called, but we must note what Paul teaches in writing to the Romans and to the Corinthians: that although God's gifts are diverse, his Spirit is nevertheless one. Therefore, when the Spirit is called the Spirit of power, or of prudence, or of fear, he is not thereby divided, but is the one fountain and source from which various gifts flow into us, according to the grace given to each; so that sometimes someone excels in this gift who nevertheless lacks another. Thus you may see many endowed with singular prudence and experience in many matters who nevertheless lack courage and greatness of spirit. Others excel in both prudence and experience and courage, yet lack some other virtue. Sometimes God also heaps several gifts upon certain individuals — three, four, five virtues, or even more — so that those who reduced the Christian virtues to the number seven showed the greatest ignorance. God therefore distributes his gifts to each as it pleases him, but in such a way that he does not give all gifts to all, but so that the person who has one or another virtue as a special gift does not likewise have the third or fourth. In short, it must be noted that God nevertheless works in such a way that no one among men can be said to be fully and perfectly renewed — in order to keep them in modesty and humility when they notice their defects. And doubtless he well knows what is expedient for us. For if anyone were to reach such perfection that he thought he lacked nothing, content with himself, he would despise his neighbors. Let Saul be an example to us here of this distribution of gifts. For the Spirit of the Lord rushed upon him in a certain extraordinary manner, and he was changed into a new man, and the Lord gave him a new heart. For whereas he had previously been a rustic tending to rustic matters, God cast a royal mind into him, so that he might become fit for governing and ruling the people. Therefore, already distinguished by this gift, he is again augmented by another, as the prophetic spirit comes upon him. But did he not already have the Spirit? Indeed he did, but God adds a special gift, and heaps grace upon grace, and adorns and ennobles him also with the gift of prophecy, so that by that outward sign he might be rendered more honored and dearer and more acceptable to the people, when he would be declared king given to them by God. By these things we are taught to use the gifts received from God for the benefit of our neighbors, just as in turn the gifts of our neighbors ought to contribute to our benefit, so that the mutual sharing of gifts may ensure that no one claims anything as his own property, but that from the gifts of others each one may also reap fruit. God could indeed, as I said before, make us perfect in a moment; but then there would be no sharing with our neighbors. For how would we foster brotherly love if each person were furnished with every gift? how would we foster brotherly love if each person were furnished with every gift? Then there would also be added a far more serious evil: pride surpassing virtue. Therefore, for the bond and preservation of human society, it is necessary that we still be imperfect, so that we may be kept within the bounds of modesty and humility, and be content with the measure of God's gifts. For this reason each person is bound to contribute to the common good whatever endowments he has received, and thus to perform his duty according to the measure of his gifts, so that the benefit may return to the whole church. This will easily be done if we compare the endowments we have received with those we do not have, and from that we will have ample occasion to keep ourselves in modesty. Then also if we compare ourselves with others, and our gifts with theirs — for example, if a man distinguished by singular prudence and understanding compares himself with an unskilled and ignorant person, and recognizes that he indeed surpasses in understanding, but that the other in turn surpasses him in another gift — the result will be that he concludes that the other is therefore not to be despised. Furthermore, we must make every effort, whatever gifts we excel in, to pray for their increase and enlargement from God, and never let weariness of what we have received, however small, seize us. For we are never so abundant as to be filled up, and therefore all arrogance must be avoided, by which we persuade ourselves that we can do without others. On the contrary, the enlargement of God's gifts must be sought from us with perpetual hunger and thirst, and through prayers we must also obtain their legitimate use.

And enough of these things. Next follows that those who had known Saul yesterday and the day before (that is, previously, according to the usage of the Hebrew language) said to one another, because he was with the prophets and was prophesying: 'What has happened to the son of Kish? Is Saul also among the prophets?' And another answered: 'And who is their father?' Therefore it became a proverb: 'Is Saul also among the prophets?' That amazement sufficiently shows that there was no preparation or disposition in Saul for prophecy, and that consequently the grace of God was thus specifically manifested and displayed. For those men would not have been struck with such great amazement if Saul had been educated in the schools from his tender years and had finally prophesied, because they would have supposed him to have been previously taught and formed, and accordingly, already prepared and educated, they would not have marveled that he prophesied, nor would they have taken it as a new and unusual thing. And so the gift of God would have lain hidden, as if obscured by shadows — a gift which God wished to be most conspicuous for his own glory. For it happens that things which are ordinary and common to us become worthless and slip away. But when God suddenly sets something remarkable before our eyes and performs an evident miracle, then it is fitting that our senses be roused, and that from our astonishment and amazement we be led to the recognition of the divine work. But how great is the stupidity of men, who keep hesitating and pass lightly over God's works! Indeed they are by nature unfit and incapable of recognizing God's power and might, even though he reveals himself by sufficiently open testimonies — unless God himself stirs their minds and, as it were, leads them by the hand to the knowledge of his work. Let those people serve as an example who indeed marvel that Saul prophesies, but do not perceive that it happens beyond the order of nature. Indeed they ought to have risen up to God and recognized his work, and awaited the outcome of that miracle, which could not have happened without the secret power of God. But they remain in their stupor as if thunderstruck, and merely wonder with astonishment what has happened to the son of Kish. From this we must learn that when God gives us certain signs of his power, they are to be received with such admiration that we lift our minds all the way to heaven and render to God the praise that is due to him, and that we make use of them in such a way that we do not cling to these earthly and perishable things, gazing up at them with admiration, but rise up to the Author himself. Then this also must be considered: that God worked in Saul in such a way that he inspired astonishment and wonder at the event in everyone, so that they might thus be prepared to receive the one whom God had destined as king, with God, as it were, ennobling him with these marks of distinction. And from this a general doctrine must be drawn: when God raises us to some rank of dignity, this honor must be given to him — that we ascribe all our gifts to him. This Paul beautifully teaches us when speaking of the origin of the whole church, saying that 'God chose the foolish things of the world, and the weak things, and the base things, so that no flesh should glory before him, but let him who glories glory in the Lord.' And thus the wise person should claim nothing for himself, but acknowledge his wisdom as received from God. 'Consider,' he says, 'your calling, brothers: not many of you are wise according to the flesh, not many are powerful, not many are noble.' As if to say: God could indeed have chosen from among you the wisest and most noble of all, for at that time many distinguished men, eminent in wisdom and renowned for nobility, stood out among the Corinthians, by whom God's glory could have been illustrated. But it did not seem right to God to begin with them. Whom then, I ask, did God choose? Lowly nobodies, uneducated and illiterate, of no name or authority among men. And indeed such a striking transformation provided occasion to wonder more and more at God's mercy and love toward the human race. Therefore the ways of the Lord are to be observed here by us — he who, in order to make his grace more illustrious among men, raises up wretched and abject people, and, as the prophet says, those lying in filth, to the tribunal of the greatest kings. Whenever, therefore, God raises up people who were previously abject and lowly and establishes them in some rank of dignity, let us know that we are being led to wonder, so that beholding such a transformation we may rise up to God, who presents himself to us in this way to be adored, and removes the veil from our eyes, lest we be repelled from his sight and contemplation, but rather, admiring his wisdom, we may extol him with worthy praises, and whenever he offers us his grace and gift, we may embrace it in such a way that we render due honor to the giver. You see what benefit we ought to derive from that amazement of the people, prompted by which they said: 'What is this, that Saul also is among the prophets?' There follows that someone from the common people responded: 'But who is Saul's father?' Some understand 'father' to mean 'master.' But this interpretation is too forced. Others refer it to God, as if God were called the father of the prophets. I acknowledge indeed that God is in a general sense the father of the entire human race. For he deigns to honor us wretched and needy mortals so greatly as to call us his children, even from the perspective of creation alone. But that interpretation does not at all suit this passage, since because of sin we are exiled from the kingdom of heaven, and we have no portion with God (unless we are reborn by grace); indeed, he abhors us until we are reconciled to him. But since he has impressed upon us the mark of his paternal love, for that reason we are called his children. Yet also by pagan writers kings are specifically called sons of God, because evidently he raised them to such great dignity — just as the prophet himself says: 'You are gods and sons of the Most High.' Therefore kings, princes, and chief magistrates are called sons of God, because God chose them as those in whom he would most reveal his majesty and make it more illustrious. It is therefore most true that God is the father of kings and magistrates, which is also common to prophets and teachers, since they too bore a special mark of divine election and of his gifts and benefits, which were more conspicuous in them than in others. Therefore it is also true that God was the father of the prophets, since from their special calling God's particular care must be recognized. But these things do not at all suit this passage. Therefore God is not here called Saul's father. But in another sense the question is asked: who is Saul's father? Namely, so that it might be recognized that the gift of prophecy is not hereditary, and that accordingly this change was not from the order of nature, and that one ought not to rest in this amazement, asking how Saul prophesies, because he was the son of a rustic man. And indeed those judge wrongly who form a judgment about someone based on his family and lineage. For the singular and particular gifts of God are not to be examined according to someone's stock or origin, but must be weighed according to the dignity of him who distributes them. Thus we see the Jews were greatly mistaken and shamefully deceived when they looked at the appearance and origin of our Lord Jesus Christ, and they willfully brought stumbling blocks upon themselves, saying: 'Where does this man get this wisdom and these powers? Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary, and his brothers James and Joses?' etc. Consider the rash judgment of the Jews, whom we rightly see condemned by all, because they were blind to God's manifest grace and willfully brought darkness upon themselves, so that they might not behold and acknowledge the grace shining so splendidly in Christ — whose brilliance, however, was drawing all who were struck by it to adore him. But those wretches, on the contrary, seize from this an occasion for recoiling, and willfully bring stumbling blocks upon themselves, because our Lord Jesus Christ was the son of a carpenter, because he was not born of high rank, because he had not been educated in the schools, because in short he was of low birth and similar to some craftsman who had never left his house. In this passage, then, that saying is specifically expressed, so that we may learn that the judgment of those who cast in the faces of children the condition of their parents is wrong and foolish, saying: 'Who is this one's or that one's father?' For this is a certain and indubitable principle: that parents cannot instill in their children the spirit of wisdom, gentleness, or any other virtue, the way they leave material goods and earthly possessions to them by inheritance. Indeed, it happens by God's singular benefit that parents transmit their goods to their children; but nevertheless it usually happens that children come into their parents' goods and inheritance. But that the excellent gifts of the Spirit should be transferred from parents to children and left as an inherited trait — this never happens, but rather the contrary. And indeed it rarely happens that some distinguished man leaves behind a son similar to himself. When this does occur, God wishes it to be recognized as the greatest benefit. For if fathers produced children in all respects similar to themselves, those spiritual gifts would seem to come about by hereditary succession, and thus so much would be taken away from God's generosity and goodness, and it would lie half-buried, and consequently God would be deprived of his praise. Therefore, often either something is lacking in the parents' duty, or in the children. Often also, on the contrary, you may see certain people from their very cradles excelling in those graces which others only attain with the greatest labor and difficulty. In short, we see that the children of heroes or distinguished men are not always similar to their fathers. And on the contrary, those born of lowly and humble station, whom no dignity or authority of their parents commends, grow — by God's doing — into the most illustrious and bravest men. Let us therefore make every effort, whenever God raises certain people to some rank of dignity and makes them distinguished by virtues, not to look with dim eyes and, seized with amazement, exclaim: 'Who is this? From what ancestors was he born? By what arts did he arrive at this dignity?' — and thereby seize an occasion to reject God's grace, which he bestows on men. And let us know that the honor with which God dignifies men when he endows them with the gifts of his Holy Spirit does not come by succession.

from parents to children, but is the grace of God. And although sometimes children share in the gifts in which their parents excelled, let us hold it as a firm conviction that this flows from the singular grace and benevolence of God, who distributes his gifts to whom and in whatever manner he wills. Therefore let us recognize God's grace and virtues wherever they appear, and let us esteem and honor them as is fitting, unless we wish to be contemptuous toward God himself. And let us know that this is the way of the divine works: that from God alone all good and happiness flows, and let us learn to depend on him alone, turning our eyes away from all human causes and lifting them to the providence of the one God, by whose sole will and decision all things are governed. Let us know, then, that by this saying the foolish opinion of those is rebuked who form a judgment about a man's virtues from his birth and family — just as those people were asking what had happened to the son of Kish, and how Saul could be among the prophets. And therefore let us carefully take care not to tie God or his gifts to the persons of men. For experience testifies that God bestows his gifts not only on the rich, nor always on them, but on the contrary more often on the ignoble and people of the lowest condition, whom he calls from the very stables to the highest honors. Thus we see the prophet David professing this very thing about himself: that he was chosen by God and raised from the sheepfolds to the royal dignity, having done nothing to deserve it. For so he himself speaks in Psalm 78: 'He chose David his servant, and taking him from the sheepfolds, from following the nursing ewes he led him to shepherd Jacob his people.' Amos likewise declares about himself that he had not previously been a prophet nor had the gift of prophecy. 'For,' he says, 'I was previously a herdsman, when God saw fit to call me to this office.' Seeing these things, therefore, let us learn to praise God all the more in all his gifts and to reserve to him his proper praise, taking the greatest care lest the lowliness and contempt of the men upon whom he has bestowed his gifts detract anything from God's praise, and lest his gifts become cheap on account of the persons. There follows that from this arose the common proverb: 'Is not Saul also among the prophets?' This saying seems to have been used when someone was called to some condition of life that he had never thought of, or when someone undertook a difficult and arduous task and accomplished it beyond everyone's expectation; then it was said: 'Saul among the prophets.' Therefore, if someone who was previously uneducated or too dull for getting things done undertook something and accomplished it skillfully, then the proverb would come up: 'Is not Saul among the prophets?' If someone had not been learned from childhood but later acquired prudence and skill, becoming a sharp and industrious man in conducting affairs and giving good counsel, then too the proverb was used: 'Saul among the prophets.' I confess indeed that the proverb arose partly from ignorance; for, as I said before, the people of Israel ought to have admired that sudden transformation in Saul in such a way as to recall to mind God's power, who changes created things at his sole nod according to his will, even though the causes of such change are hidden from men. Nevertheless, it was published not without some fruit and benefit; for thus God wished there to remain a testimony of his power to change men in an instant whenever it seemed good to him, and to make them entirely new creatures. Therefore, although the proverb originated from ignorance, it nevertheless contained a useful doctrine in itself, so that the people might be reminded, whenever mention of Saul came up, that he had been appointed king by God's decree and prepared and formed for that office by God. For otherwise, when such changes occurred, the people would have fallen into the kind of amazement and stupor into which we see them falling, as if heaven and earth, so to speak, were being mixed together. God therefore willed the memory of this event to endure, as it were, forever, so that it might be publicly known that such changes are not to be attributed to any fortune but to the power of God alone — which, the more remarkable it is, the greater admiration it ought to arouse, and inflame us more to praising God.

Finally, it is said that Saul ceased prophesying when he had come to the high place. These words can indeed be understood of the whole assembly, as if they had ceased prophesying — because they prophesied at a certain place and for a certain span of time, just as today a sermon is preached at set hours, and afterward the whole congregation is dismissed. Then, when they had come to the high place, it is likely that Saul withdrew from that company of prophets after each had completed his turn. And it is also certain that this gift of prophecy in Saul was temporary, and that he did not receive the spirit of prophesying as others did who had been exercised in it for a longer time. For God wished to make him conspicuous by that sign and to reveal publicly that he had been appointed king by God. Thus Saul's prophesying is to be understood as not being a perpetual gift of prophecy, but only a specimen of the divine benefit, so that the people might thereafter expect something great from him — and thus this gift of prophesying bestowed on Saul was temporary.

Now then, let us bow in prayer, etc.

Keep reading in the app.

Listen to every chapter with premium audiobooks that highlight each sentence as it's spoken.