Chapter 9: The Death of Christ and Arminian Controversy

The sum of those controversies, wherewith the Arminians, and their abettors have troubled the Church, about the death of Christ, may be reduced to heads. First, concerning the object of his merit, or whom he died for. Secondly, concerning the efficacy and end of his death, or what he deserved, procured, merited, and obtained, for them for whom he died: in resolution of the first, they affirm, that he died for all, and every one: of the second, that he died for no one man at all; in that sense, Christians have hitherto believed that he laid down his life, and submitted himself to bear the burden of his Father's wrath, for their sakes. It seems to me a strange extenuation of the merit of Christ, to teach, that no good at all by his death does redound to divers of them for whom he died: what participation, in the benefit of his suffering, had Pharaoh or Judas? Do they not at this hour, and shall they not to eternity, feel the weight and burden of their own sins? Had they either grace in this world, or glory in the other, that they should be said to have an interest in the death of our Savior? Christians have hitherto believed, that for whom Christ died, for their sins he made satisfaction; that they themselves should not externally suffer for them: is God unjust to punish twice, for the same fault? His own Son once? And again the poor sinners, for whom he suffered? I cannot conceive an intention in God, that Christ should satisfy his justice for the sin of them, that were in hell some thousands of years before, and yet be still resolved to continue their punishment on them to all eternity? No doubtless; Christ gives life to everyone, for whom he gave his life: he loses not one of them, whom he purchased with his blood.

The first part of this controversy, may be handled, under these two questions. First, whether God giving his Son, and Christ making his soul a ransom for sin, intended thereby to redeem all and every one, from their sins, that all and every one alike, from the beginning of the world, to the last day, should all equally be partakers of the fruits of his death and passion; which purpose of theirs is in the most frustrate. Secondly, whether God had not a certain infallible intention, of gathering to himself a chosen people, of collecting a Church of first born, of saving his little flock, of bringing some certainly to happiness, by the death of his only Son, which in the event he does accomplish.

The second part also may be reduced to these two heads: first, whether Christ did not make full satisfaction, for all their sins for whom he died, and merited glory, or everlasting happiness, to be bestowed on them, upon the performance of those conditions, God should require? Secondly, (which is the proper controversy I shall chiefly insist upon,) whether Christ did not procure for his own people, a power to become the sons of God, merit and deserve at the hands of God for them, grace, faith, righteousness, and sanctification, whereby they may be enabled infallibly, to perform the conditions of the new Covenant, upon the which, they shall be admitted to glory.

To the first question, of the first part of the controversy, the Arminians answer affirmatively, to wit, that Christ died for all alike, the benefit of his passion, belongs equally to all the posterity of Adam: and to the second negatively, that God had no such intention of bringing many chosen sons to salvation, by the death of Christ; but determined of grace and glory, no more precisely to one, then to another, to John, than Judas, Abraham, than Pharaoh: both which as the learned Moulin observed, seem to be invented to make Christianity ridiculous, and expose our religion, to the derision, of all knowing men: for who can possibly conceive that one by the appointment of God should die for another; and yet that other, by the same justice be allotted to death himself, when one's death only was due: that Christ has made a full satisfaction for their sins, who shall everlastingly feel the weight of them, themselves; that he should merit and obtain reconciliation with God for them, who live and die his enemies: grace and glory for them, who are graceless in this life, and damned in that which is to come: that he should get remission of sins for them, whose sins were never pardoned: in brief, if this sentence be true, either Christ by his death did not reconcile us to God, make satisfaction to his justice for our iniquities, redeem us from our sins, purchase a kingdom, an everlasting inheritance for us, which, I hope no Christian will say, or else all the former absurdities must necessarily follow, which no rational man will ever admit.

Neither may we be charged, as straiteners of the merit of Christ: for we advance the true value and worth thereof, (as hereafter will appear,) far beyond all, that the Arminians ascribe to it: we confess that, that blood of God (Acts 20:28), of the Lamb without spot or blemish (1 Peter 1:19), was so exceedingly precious, of that infinite worth and value, that it might have saved a thousand believing worlds (John 3:16; Romans 3:22); his death was of sufficient dignity, to have been made a ransom, for all the sins of every one in the world: and on this internal sufficiency of his death and passion, is grounded the universality of evangelical promises, which have no such restriction in their own nature, as that they should not be made to all, and every one, though the promulgation and knowledge of them, is tied only to the good pleasure of God's special providence (Matthew 16:17), as also that economy, and dispensation of the new Covenant, whereby the partition wall being broken down, there remains no more difference between Jew, and Gentile, the utmost borders of the earth being given in for Christ's inheritance: so that in some sense, Christ may be said to die for all, and the whole world: first, in as much as the worth and value of his death, was very sufficient to have been made a price for all their sins: secondly, in as much as this word All, is taken for some of all sorts, not for every one, of every sort, as it is frequently used in the holy Scripture, so Christ being lifted up drew all to him (John 12:32), that is, believers out of all sorts of men: the Apostles cured all diseases, or some of all sorts, they did not cure every particular disease, but there was no kind of disease, that was exempted from their power of healing: so that where it is said, that Christ died for all, it is meant either; first, all the faithful; or secondly, some of all sorts; thirdly, not only Jews, but Gentiles.

Secondly, the proper counsel and intention of God, in sending his Son into the world, to die, was, that thereby he might confirm and ratify, the new Covenant to his elect: and purchase for them, all the good things, which are contained in the tenure of that Covenant: to wit, grace, and glory: that by his death, he might bring many, (yet some certain) children to glory, obtaining for them, that were given to him, by his Father, that is, his whole Church, reconciliation with God, remission of sins, faith, righteousness, sanctification and life eternal: that is, the end, to which they are to be brought, and the means whereby God will have them attain it: he died that he might gather the dispersed children of God, and make them partakers of everlasting glory, to give eternal life, to all that God gave to him (John 17:2). And on this purpose, of himself, and his Father, is founded the intercession of Christ, for his elect and chosen people, performed partly on the earth (John 17), partly in heaven before the throne of grace: which is nothing but a presentation of himself, and his merits, accompanied with the prayers of his mediatorship, before God: that he would be pleased to grant, and effectually to apply, the good things, he has by them obtained, to all for whom he has obtained them: his intercession in heaven, is nothing but a continued oblation of himself. So that whatever Christ impetrated, merited, or obtained, by his death and passion, must be infallibly applied to, and bestowed upon them, for whom he intended to obtain it: or else his intercession is vain, he is not heard in the prayers of his mediatorship: an actual reconciliation with God, and communication of grace and glory, must needs betide all them that have any such interest in the righteousness of Christ, as to have it accepted for their good: the sole end, why Christ would so dearly purchase those good things, is an actual application of them, to his chosen: God set forth the propitiation of his blood, for the remission of sins, that he might be the justifier of him that believes on Jesus (Romans 3:25, 26). But this part of the controversy is not that which I principally intend: only I will give you a brief sum, of those reasons which overthrow their heresy, in this particular branch thereof.

First, the death of Christ, is in divers places of the Scripture restrained to his people, and elect, his Church, and sheep (Matthew 1:21; John 10:11, 12, 13; Acts 20:28; Ephesians 5:25; John 11:52; Romans 8:32, 33; Hebrews 2:10, 13; Revelation 5:9; Daniel 9:27), and therefore the good purchased thereby, ought not to be extended, to dogs, reprobates, and those that are without.

Secondly, for whom Christ died, he died as their sponsor, in their room and turn, that he might free them from the guilt, and desert of death, which is clearly expressed (Romans 5:6, 7, 8). He was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities, the chastisement of our peace was upon him, and with his stripes, we are healed (Isaiah 53:5, 6, &c.). He has redeemed us, from the curse, being made a curse for us (Galatians 3:13). He made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin (1 Corinthians 5:21). Evidently he changes turns with us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him. Yes, in other things, it is plain in the Scripture, that to die for another, is to take his place and room, with an intention that he should live (2 Samuel 18:33; Romans 5). So that Christ dying for men, made satisfaction, for their sins, that they should not die: now for what sins he made satisfaction, for them the justice of God is satisfied, which surely is not done for the sins of the reprobates, because he justly punishes them to eternity, upon themselves (Matthew 5:26).

Thirdly, for whom Christ died, for them also he rose again, to make intercession for them, for whose offences he was delivered, for their justification he was raised (Romans 4:25). And chapter 5:10, he is a high Priest to make intercession for them in the holiest of holies, for whom by his blood he obtained everlasting redemption (Hebrews 9:11, 12). Those two acts of his Priesthood are not to be separated, it belongs to the same Mediator for sin, to sacrifice and pray: our assurance that he is our Advocate, is grounded on his being a propitiation for our sins: he is an Advocate, for every one, for whose sins his blood was a propitiation (1 John 2:1, 2). But Christ does not intercede, and pray for all, as himself often witnesses (John 17). He makes intercession only for them, who come to God by him (Hebrews 7:24). He is not a Mediator of them that perish, no more than an Advocate of them that fail in their suits, and therefore the benefit of his death also must be restrained to them, who are finally partakers of both: we must not so disjoin the offices of Christ's mediatorship, that one of them may be exercised about some towards whom he exercises not the other: much less ought we, so to separate the several acts of the same office. For whom Christ is a Priest, to offer himself a sacrifice, for their sins, he is surely a King, to apply the good things purchased by his death to them, as Arminius himself confesses; much more to whom he is a Priest by sacrifice he will be a Priest by intercession: and therefore, seeing he does not intercede and pray for every one, he did not die for every one.

Fourthly, for whom Christ died, he merited grace, and glory, faith, and salvation, and reconciliation with God, as I shall show hereafter; but this he has not done for all, and every one: many do never believe, the wrath of God remains upon some, the wrath of God abides on them that do not believe (1 John 3:16). To abide, argues a continued uninterrupted act: now to be reconciled to one, and yet to lie under his heavy anger, seem to me [〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉], things that will scarce consist together: the reasons are many, I only point at the heads of some of them.

Fifthly, Christ died for them, whom God gave to him, to be saved, "yours they were, and you gave them to me" (John 17:6). He lays down his life, for the sheep committed to his charge (John 10:11). But all are not the sheep of Christ, all are not given to him of God, to be brought to glory: for of those that are so given, there is not one that perishes, for he gives eternal life to as many as God has given him (John 17:2). No man is able to pluck them out of his Father's hands (chapter 10:28, 29).

Sixthly, look whom, and how many, that love of God embraced, that was the cause of sending his Son to redeem them: for them, and so many, did Christ according to the counsel of his Father, and in himself intentionally, lay down his life. Now this love is not universal, being his good pleasure of blessing with spiritual blessings and saving some in Christ (Ephesians 1:4, 5), which good pleasure of his, evidently comprehends some, when others are excluded (Matthew 11:25, 26). Yes, the love of God in giving Christ for us is of the same extent, with that grace, whereby he calls us to faith, or bestows faith on us: for he has called us with a holy calling, according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Jesus Christ (2 Timothy 2:9), which doubtless is not universal and common to all.

Innumerable other reasons there are to prove, that seeing God has given his elect only, whom only he loved to Christ to be redeemed: and seeing that the Son loves only those who are given him of his Father, and redeems only whom he loves: seeing also that the holy Spirit, the love of the Father and the Son, sanctifies all, and only them that are elected, and redeemed — it is not our part, with a preposterous liberality against the witness of Christ himself, to assign the salvation attained by him, as due to them, that are without the congregation of them whom the Father has loved, and chosen: without that Church, which the Son loved and gave his life for it, nor none of the members of that sanctified body, whereof Christ is the Head and Savior. I urge no more, because this is not that part of the controversy that I desire to lay open.

I come now to consider the main question of this difference, though sparingly handled by our divines: concerning what our Savior merited, and purchased for them for whom he died. And here you shall find the old idol playing his pranks, and quite divesting the merit of Christ, from the least ability or power, of doing us any good; for though the Arminians pretend very speciously, that Christ died for all men: yet in effect, they make him die for no one man at all: and that by denying the effectual operation of his death, and ascribing the proper issues of his passion, to the brave endeavors of their own Pelagian deity.

We (according to the Scriptures) plainly believe, that Christ has by his righteousness, merited for us grace and glory; that we are blessed with all spiritual blessings, in, though, and for him: that he is made to us righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption; that he has procured for us, and that God for his sake, bestows on us every grace, in this life, that makes us differ from others, and all that glory we hope for, in that which is to come: he procured for us remission of all our sins, an actual reconciliation with God, faith, and obedience. Yes, but this is such a desperate doctrine, as stabs at the very heart of the idol: and would make him as altogether useless, as if he were but a fig-tree log. What remains for him to do, if all things in this great work of our salvation, must be thus ascribed to Christ, and the merit of his death? Therefore the worshippers of this great God, *Lib. Arbit.* oppose their engines against the whole fabric, and cry down the title of Christ's merits, to these spiritual blessings, in the behalf of their imaginary deity.

Now because they are things of a two-fold denomination, about which we contend, before the king of heaven; each part producing their evidence; the first springing from the favor of God towards us: the second from the working of his grace, actually within us, I shall handle them severally, and apart. Especially because to things of this latter sort, gifts, as we call them, enabling us to fulfill the condition, required, for the attaining of glory, we lay a double claim, on God's behalf: First, as the death of Christ, is the meritorious cause procuring them of him: Secondly, as his free grace is their efficient cause working them in us; they also producing a double title, whereby, they would invest their beloved darling, with a sole propriety in causing these effects. First, in regard that they are our own acts performed in us, and by us: secondly, as they are parts of our duty, which we are enjoined to do, so that the quarrel is directly between Christ's merits and our own free will, about procuring the favor of God, and obtaining grace and righteousness, let us see what they say to the first.

They affirm that the immediate, and proper effect, or end, of the death and passion of Christ, is not an actual oblation of sin from men, not an actual remission of iniquities, justification and redemption, of any soul: that is, Christ his death, is not the meritorious cause of the remission of our sins, of redemption, and justification. The meritorious cause, I say, for of some of them, as of justification, as it is terminated in us, we confess there are causes of other kinds, as faith is the instrument, and the holy Spirit the efficient thereof. But for the sole meritorious procuring cause, of these spiritual blessings, we always took it to be the righteousness, and death of Christ: believing plainly, that the end why Christ died, and the fruit of his sufferings, was our reconciliation with God, redemption from our sins, freedom from the curse, deliverance from the wrath of God, and power of hell: though we be not actual partakers of these things to the pacification of our own consciences, without the intervening operation of the holy Spirit, and faith by him wrought in us.

But if this be not? Pray what is obtained by the death of Christ? Why a potential, conditional reconciliation, not actual, and absolute, says Corvinus: but yet this potential reconciliation, being a new expression, never intimated in the Scripture, and scarce of itself intelligible, we want a further explanation of their mind, to know what it is that directly they assign to the merits of Christ. Therefore, they tell us, that the fruit of his death, was such an impetration, or obtaining of reconciliation with God, and redemption for us: that God thereby has a power, his justice being satisfied, and so not compelling him to the contrary, to grant remission of sins, to sinful men, on what condition, he would. Or as another speaks it, there was by the effusion of Christ's blood, a right obtained to, and settled in God, of reconciling the world, and of opening to all, a gate of repentance, and faith in Christ. But now whereas, the Scripture everywhere affirms, that Christ died for our good, to obtain blessings for us, to purchase our peace, to acquire and merit for us, the good things contained in the promise of the Covenant, this opinion seems to restrain the end, and fruit thereof, to the obtaining of a power; and liberty to God, of prescribing us a condition whereby we may be saved. But yet it may be, thus much at least Christ obtained of God in our behalf, that he should assign faith in him, to be this condition, and to bestow it upon us also. No, neither the one, nor the other, after all this, had it so seemed good to his wisdom, God might have chosen the Jews, and others, following the righteousness of the law, as well as believers, because he might have assigned, any other condition of salvation besides faith in Christ, says Grevinchovius. Notwithstanding then the death of Christ for us, we might have been held to the old rule, Do this and live. But if this be true, I cannot perceive how it may be said, that Christ died to redeem us from our sins, to save our souls, and bring us to glory. Neither perhaps, do they think this to be any great inconvenience, for the same author affirms, that Christ cannot be said properly to die, to save any one. And a little after he more fully declares himself, that after Christ had obtained all that he did obtain by his death, the right remained wholly in God, to apply it, or not to apply it, as it should seem good to him. The application of grace and glory, to any man, was not the end for which Christ obtained them, but to get a right and power to God, of bestowing those things on what sort of men he would: which argues no redemption of us from our sins, but a vindication of God from such a condition, wherein he had not power to forgive them; not an obtaining of salvation for us, but of a liberty to God of saving us, on some condition or other.

But now, after God has got this power by the death of Christ, and out of his gracious good pleasure, assigned faith to be the means for us to attain those blessings, he has procured himself a liberty to bestow? Did Christ obtain this faith for us, of him, if it be a thing not in our own power? No: faith is not obtained by the death of Christ, says Corvinus: so that there is no good thing, no spiritual blessing, into which, any man in the world has any interest by the death of Christ. Which is not so great an absurdity, but that they are most ready to grant it: Arnoldus confesses, that he believes, that the death of Christ might have enjoyed its end, or his merit its full force, although, never any had believed. And again, the death and satisfaction of Christ being accomplished, it might come to pass, that, none fulfilling the condition of the new Covenant, none should be saved, so also says Grevinchovius. Oh Christ, that any pretending to profess your holy Name, should thus slight the precious work of your death and passion? Surely, never any before, who counted it their glory to be called Christians, did ever thus extenuate (their friends the Socinians only excepted) the dignity of his merit and satisfaction. Take but a short view of what benefit they allow to redound to us, by the effusion of his precious blood, and you may see what a pestilent heresy, these men have labored to bring into the Church. Neither faith nor salvation, grace nor glory, has he purchased for us, not any spiritual blessing, that by our interest in his death we can claim to be ours: it is not such a reconciliation with God, as that he thereupon, should be contented again to be called our God, it is not justification, nor righteousness, nor actual redemption from our sins, it did not make satisfaction for our iniquities, and deliver us from the curse. Only it was a means of obtaining such a possibility of salvation, as that God without wronging of his justice, might save us if he would, one way or other. So that when Christ had done all that he could, there was not one man in the world immediately the better for it. Notwithstanding the utmost of his endeavor, every one might have been damned with Judas to the pit of hell, for he died as well for Simon Magus and Judas, as he did for Peter and Paul, say the Arminians. Now if no more good redound to us by the death of Christ, than to Simon Magus, we are not much obliged to him for our salvation. No, he may be rather said to have redeemed God, than us, for he procured for him immediately a power to redeem us if he would; for us, only by virtue of that power, a possibility to be redeemed: which leaves nothing of the nature of merit annexed to his death. For that deserves that something be done, not only that it may be done: the workman deserves that his wages be given him, and not that it may be given him. And then what becomes of all the comfort and consolation that is proposed to us in the death of Christ: but it is time to see how this stubble is burned and consumed by the word of God: and that established which they thought to overthrow.

First, It is clear that Christ died to procure for us an actual reconciliation with God: and not only a power for us to be reconciled to him: for when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God, by the death of his son (Romans 5:10). We enjoy an actual reconciliation to God by his death: he is content to be called our God, when we are enemies, without the intervening of any condition on our part required: though the sweetness, comfort, and knowledge of this reconciliation, do not compass our souls before we believe in him. Again, we have remission of sins by his blood, and justification from them, not a sole vindication into such an estate, wherein, if it please God, and ourselves, our sins are pardonable: for we are justified through the redemption that is in Jesus Christ, whom God has set forth, to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins (Romans 3:24, 25). Yes, he obtained for us by his death, righteousness and holiness. He gave himself for his Church, that he might sanctify and cleanse it (Ephesians 5:26). That he might present it to himself a glorious Church, without spot, or wrinkle, that we should be holy, and without blemish (vers. 27). Where first, we have whom Christ died, or gave himself for, even his Church: secondly, what he obtained for it, holiness and righteousness, a freedom from the spots, and blemishes of sin, that is, the grace of justification and sanctity, he made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin, that we might become the righteousness of God in him (2 Corinthians 5:21). And lastly he died, to purchase for us, an everlasting inheritance (Hebrews 9:15). So that both grace and glory, are bestowed on them for whom he died, as the immediate fruits of his death and passion.

Secondly, see what the Scripture [〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉], expressly assigns, as the proper end and immediate effect, (according to the purpose of God, and his own intention) of the effusion of the blood of Jesus Christ, and you shall find that he intended by it, to take away the sins of many, to make his soul an offering for sin, that he might see his seed, that the counsel of God, might prosper in his hand (Isaiah 53): to be a ransom for many (Matthew 20:28): to bear the sins of many (Hebrews 9:28): he bore our sins in his own body on the tree, that we should live to righteousness (1 Peter 2:24): that we might become the righteousness of God in him (2 Corinthians 5:21): thereby reconciling us to God (vers. 19): he died, to reconcile us to God, in the body of his flesh, through death, that we might be holy and unblameable (Colossians 1:21, 22): to purge our sins (Hebrews 1:3): to obtain an everlasting redemption for us (Hebrews 9:12): so that if Christ by his death obtained what he did intend: he has purchased for us, not only a possibility of salvation; but holiness, righteousness, reconciliation with God, justification, freedom from the guilt, and condemning power of sin: everlasting redemption, eternal life, and glory in heaven.

Thirdly, I appeal to the consciences of all Christians. First, whether they do not suppose the very foundation of all their consolation, to be stricken at, when they shall find those places of Scripture, that affirm Christ to have died, to take away our sins, to reconcile us to God, to put away, or abolish our transgressions, to wash and regenerate us, perfectly to save us, and purchase for us an everlasting redemption, whereby he is become to us, righteousness, and redemption, and sanctification, the Lord our righteousness, and we become the righteousness of God in him: to be so wrested, as if he should be said only, to have done something, which these things might happily follow.

Secondly, whether they think it not a ready way, to impair their love, and to weaken their faith in Christ, when they shall be taught, that Christ has done no more for them, than for those that are damned in hell: that be their assurance never so great, that Christ died for them: yet there is enough to be laid to their charge to condemn them, that though God is said to have reconciled them to himself in Christ (Colossians 1:19, 20), yet indeed he is as angry with them, as with any reprobate in the world, that God loves us not first, but so long as we continue in a state of enmity against him, before our conversion, he continues our enemy also: so that the first act of friendship or love, must be performed on our part, notwithstanding that the Scripture says, we were reconciled to God being enemies (Romans 5:10).

Thirdly, whether they have not hitherto supposed themselves bound to believe, that Christ died for their sins and rose for their justification? Do they not think it lawful to pray, that God would bestow upon them, grace, and glory for Christ's sake? And to believe that Jesus Christ was such a Mediator of the new Covenant, as procured for the persons covenanted withal, all the good things comprehended in the promise of that Covenant.

I will not further press upon this prevarication against Christian religion, only I would desire all the lovers of Jesus Christ seriously to consider, whether these men, do truly aim at his honor, and advancing the dignity of his merit, and not rather, at the crying up of their own endeavors, seeing the sole cause of their denying these glorious effects of the blood of Christ: is to appropriate the praise of them to themselves, as we shall see in the next chapter.

These charges are never to be waved, by the vanity of their sophistical distinctions, as of that of impetration and application, which though it may be received, in an Orthodox meaning, yet not in that sense, or rather non-sense, whereunto they abuse it; namely, as though Christ had obtained that for some, which shall never be imparted to them, that all the blessings procured by his death are proper to none, but pendent in the air for them that can or will catch them: whereupon when we object, that by this means all the efficacy of the merit of Christ, is in our own power, they readily grant it, and say it cannot otherwise be: let them that can, receive these monsters in Christianity, for my part in these following contradictory assertions, I will choose rather to adhere to the authority of the word of God, than of Arminius and his sectaries.

S. S. He made him to be sinne for us who knew no sinne, that we might become the righteousnesse of God in him (2 Corinthians 5:21). He loved his Church and gave himselfe for it, that he might present it to himselfe a glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such things (Ephesians 5:26, 27). God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe (2 Corinthians 5:19). When you shall make his soule an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his dayes, and the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in his hand (Isaiah 53:10). By his knowledge shall my righteous servant iustifie many for he shall beare their iniquities (verse 11). Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many (Hebrews 9:28). By his own blood he entred in once into the holy place having obtained eternall redemption for us (verse 12). He has reconciled you in the body of his flesh, through death to present you holy and unblamable (Colossians 1:22). Whom God has set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousnesse for the remission of sins, &c. — that he might be iust, and the iustifier of him that beleeveth in Iesus (Romans 3:25, 26). Who his own selfe bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we being dead to sinne, should live to righteousnesse, by whose stripes we are healed (1 Peter 2:24). Lib. Arbit. The immediate effect of the death of Christ is not the remission of sins, or the actuall redemption of any, Armin. Christ did not properly die to save any one, Grevinch. A potentiall and conditionate reconciliation, not actuall and absolute is obtained by the death of Christ, Corvin. I beleeve it might have come to passe that the death of Christ might have had its end, though never any man had beleeved, Corvi. The death and satisfaction of Christ being accomplished, yet it may so come to passe that none at all fulfilling the condition of the new covenant, none might be saved, idem. The impetration of salvation for all, by the death of Christ, is nothing but the obtaining of a possibilitie thereof, that God without wronging his iustice, may open to them a gate of mercy, to be entred on some condition, Rem. Coll. Hag. Notwithstanding the death of Christ, God might have assigned any other condition of salvation as well as faith, or have chosen the Iews following the righteousnesse of the law, Grevin. Why then the efficacie of the death of Christ depends wholly on us: true? it cannot otherwise be? Rem. Apol.