Chapter 3 — Reply to Cawdrey's First Chapter

His first chapter consists for the most part, in a repetition of my words, or so much of the discourse of my first Chapter as he could wrest, by cutting off one, and another parcell of it from its coherence in the whole, with the interposure of glosses of his own, to serve him to make biting reflexions upon them with whom he has to deale. How unbecoming such a course of procedure is, for a person of his worth, gravity and profession, perhaps his [〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉], have by this time convinced him. If men have a mind to perpetuate controversies to an endless, fruitless reciprocation of words and cavils, if to provoke to easy and facile retorsions, if to heighten and aggravate differences beyond any hope of reconciliation, they may do well to deale after this manner with the writings of one another. Mr. C. knows how easy it were to make his own words, dress him up in all those ornaments wherein he labours to make me appear in the world, by such glosses, inversions, additions, and interpositions, as he is pleased to make use of; but meliora speramus. Some particulars that seem to be of any importance to our business in hand, may be remarked as we pass through it: pag. 1. He tells us the Donatists had two principles: 1. that they were the only Church of Christ in a corner of Africk, and left no Church in the world but their own; 2. that none were truly baptized, or entered members of the Church of Christ, but by some Minister of their party. These principles, he says, are again improved by men of another party: whom though yet he name not, yet it is evident whom he intends: and pag. 3. he requires my judgement of those principles.

Because I would not willingly be wanting in any thing that may tend to his satisfaction, though I have some reason to conjecture at my unhappiness in respect of the event: I shall with all integrity give him my thoughts of the principles expressed above.

1. Then, if they were considered in reference to the Donatists who owned them, I say they were wicked, corrupt, erroneous principles, tending to the disturbance of the communion of saints, and everting all the rules of love, that our Lord Jesus Christ has given to his disciples, and servants to observe: if he intend my judgment of them in reference to the Churches of England, which he calls independent, I am sorry that he should think he has any reason to make this inquiry. I know not that man in the world who is less concerned in obtaining countenance to those principles than I am. Let them who are so ready on all occasions or provocations to cast abroad the solemn forms of reproach, Schismatics, Sectaries, Heretics, and the like, search their own hearts, as to a conformity of spirit to these principles. It is not what men say, but what men do, that they shall be judged by. As the Donatists were not the first who in story were charged with Schism, no more was their Schism confined to Africk. The agreement of multitudes in any principles, makes it in itself not one whit better, and in effect worse. For my part I acknowledge the Churches in England, Scotland and France, Helvetia, the Netherlands, Germany, Greece, Muscovia, &c. as far as I know of them, to be true Churches; such for ought I know may be in Italy or Spain; and what pretence or color this Reverend person has to fix a contrary persuasion upon me, with so many odious imputations and reflections, of being one of the Restorers of all lost Churches, and the like, I profess I know not. These things will not be peace in the latter end; shall the sword devour for ever? I dare not suppose that he will ask why then do I separate from them? He has read my book of Schism, wherein I have undeniably proved, that I have separated from none of them, and I am loath to say, though I fear before the close of my discourse I shall be compelled to it, that this Reverend Author has answered a matter before he understood it, and confuted a book, whose main and chief design he did not once apprehend. The rest of this chapter is composed of reflections upon me from my own words wrested at his pleasure, and added to according to the purpose in hand, and the taking for granted to that end that they are in the right, we in the wrong, that their Churches are true churches, and yet not esteemed so by me, that we have separated from those churches, with such like easy suppositions. He is troubled that I thought the mutual chargings of each other with Schism, between the Presbyterians, and Independents was as to its heat abated and ready to vanish: wherein he has invincibly compelled me to acknowledge my mistake; and I assure him I am heartily sorry that I was mistaken, it will not be some bodies joy one day that I was so. He seems to be offended with my notion of Schism, because if it be true, it will carry it almost out of the world, and bless the churches with everlasting peace. He tells me that a learned Doctor said my book was one great Schism, I hope that is but one Doctor's opinion; because being nonsense it is not fit it should be entertained by many. In the process of his discourse he culls out sundry passages delivered by me in reference to the great divisions and differences, that are in the world among men professing the name of Christ, and applies them to the difference between the Presbyterians and Independents, with many notable lashes in his way; when they were very little in my thoughts, nor are the things spoken by me in any tolerable measure applicable to them. I suppose no rational man will expect, that I should follow our Reverend Author in such ways and paths as these; it were easy in so doing to enter into an endless maze of words, to little purpose, and I have no mind to deal with him as he has done by me, I like not the copy so well as to write by it; so his first chapter is discussed, and forgiven.